Why should members of congress fly military planes?

Question

Should they not have to experience the difficulties of travel that we the peasants put up with?
Are they the ruling class or are they our representatives?

Answer 1

Good one!
ONLY the President and the VP should have a military plane. Nancy Pelosi does not need to fly an entourage with her. What in the world did she do BEFORE she was Speaker of the House?

Answer 2

FACT CHECK: Washington Times Publishes False Report On Pelosi’s Use Of Military Aircraft

On February 1, the Washington Times published a story titled “Speaker pursues military flights,” which claimed that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) had been “pressing the Bush administration for routine access to military aircraft for domestic flights, such as trips back to her San Francisco district.” Former Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) also used military aircraft to travel to his district. However, the Times reported, Pelosi is “demanding permanent access to a large military jet for herself, her staff, other Members and supporters.”

The story was disseminated widely through right-wing talk radio and blogs, spurring posts like, “First Class Pelosi,” “Air Force Becomes Pelosi Air,” “Nancy Pelosi is Drunk With Power,” “The Imperial Speakership,” “Pelosi: Fly Me Awayyyyy,” “Pelosi wants military airlift,” and “Nancy Pelosi’s Private Military Plane.”

In fact, the central claims of the Washington Times piece are *both false*.

1) The House Sergeant at Arms, not Pelosi, initiated inquiries into the use of military aircraft. House Sergeant at Arms Wilson Livingood, who has served in his position since 1995, released a statement today clarifying the facts. He writes, “In December 2006, I advised Speaker Pelosi that the US Air Force had made an airplane available to Speaker Hastert for security and communications purposes following September 11, 2001.” Additionally, Livingood writes, “I offered to call the U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense to seek clarification of the guidelines [which governed Speaker Hastert’s use of a plane].”

2) A larger plane was requested because Hastert’s plane required refueling to travel cross-country. The Washington Times says a larger plane was requested to accomodate Pelosi, “her staff, other Members and supporters.” That’s not true. In fact, the plane used by Speaker Hastert was too small for Pelosi since it “needs to refuel every 2,000 miles and could not make the nonstop haul to California. ‘The Air Force determined that [Pelosi’s] safety would be best ensured by using a plane that has the fuel capacity to go coast-to-coast,’” a Pelosi spokesperson said.

Source(s):

Reminder - Nancy Pelosi is third in line to the Presidency. We must ensure her safety, just like we hide Cheney in a bunker every time there is a perceived threat. This was not her request, but prudence and logic says she should not have to take off and land multiple times to get across the country!

Answer 3

i favor both parties paying for their own flights,beyond a set limit of flights. over the years politicians have wasted too much money on flying. i'm sure we all would travel more if someone else was paying for it. politics on a federal level has become very corrupt,mainly because we are allowing it to happen.

Answer 4

Well (gulp) She's third in command of our nation now.. so I can understand her having some transport (Peloci) But she does not need her own equivilant of Air Force one the jet she wants is just overkill I can understand a 10-12 passenger jet.. but one that seats 42 with a broadcast room.... uhhhh no none for you