2007-02-07 23:41:37 · 3 answers · asked by NerdlogosAdmin 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Theater & Acting
In my opinion, Hamlet payed for his indecision 2 ways. The first way is that it totally disrupted all his relationships. Everything became tainted as he pondered about his problem. Secondly, I believe Hamlet payed for his indecision with his life. If he had just gone ahead and planned and acted, then things would have turned out differently.
2007-02-08 01:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by Bethe W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hamlet spends the whole play in indecision. As a result, events transpire around him and not through him, and his mother, lover, friend, and himself all die.
If he had acted in the beginning he could have killed Claudius, taken the throne and gone to war with Fortinbras.
2007-02-08 05:20:43 · answer #2 · answered by Year of the Monkey 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No via fact all of us be conscious of the beginning of Hamlet and that they've been written via Shakespeare. And all of us be conscious of that Shakespeare wrote fictional performs. The bible is alleged to have been written via God, even though it is been edited via people for years and years and years, so it is in simple terms about impossible to locate the genuine earthly beginning. this is why human beings debate its truthfulness.
2016-12-17 05:08:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋