I don't know that anybody actually LIKES abortion. But it does seem that there are way too many people who are ready to defend and excuse those filthy, sick, perverted creeps that hurt the children who have been born.
****
Here's a list of some of the judges who have "spared" some of these perverts
Judge Cashman-Vermont
Judge Cecava-Nevada
Judge Connor-Ohio
2007-02-07 23:42:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
Abortions have been a part of reality for a long long time, and nothing is going to change that. The best way to lessen the instance of abortion is through honest sex education with an emphasis on abstinence, but abstinence cannot be the end all and be all in the discussion of sex. Abortion is a matter of choice, women made the choice to have abortions even before it was legalized, but it is not a simple black and white issue, and anyone one on either side of the debate who tries to paint abortion as being totally right or totally wrong is misinformed and naive. When it comes down to it, only the woman making the decision knows what is best, and I support her decision about HER body.
2007-02-07 23:38:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Seraphim 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I have been pro life all my life. I myself would not have an abortion that was not medically necessary.
However.......... With the rate of child abuse on the rise, and the fact that child protective services doesn't do anything to protect a child from this harm.... (in Illinois and Indiana anyways) I have seen and reported many children that were being abused and the dept. Didn't do anything.
So my question is , Is it really that bad to abort an unwanted child early.......... then for the parents to be mad and beat it and neglect it ? I myself would rather them make the choice not to have the baby rather then abuse it after its born.
Alot of women dont want them but have them so the state welfare system will allow them to not work and take care of them.
Id rather see a person give the baby up for adoption, but it is their choice, Just not a choice for me.
2007-02-07 23:38:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by tammer 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
simply by fact it is not a "infant," that's a blob of jelly, and it has taken over her physique with out her consent. she would be able to abort for the comparable reason she would be able to shoot somebody in the event that they attempt to attack her. that's a non-consensual violation of her actual integrity. the actuality that it is not even alive only makes it *much extra* stupid to assert she would be able to't abort. A pump (and it is not even a real pump - it is single-chamber and does not flow everywhere) isn't adequate for some thing to be considered a man or woman. We pull the plug on techniques-ineffective persons simply by fact with no techniques, they're only meat with a pump. And a fetus isn't even that - it does not somewhat have a physique of its own considering that each little thing is being run by the female's physique, and it does not even have an entire coronary heart. P.S. Prostitution is only unlawful in case you do not movie it. in case you do, then we call it porn and it is criminal. the two way, the two might desire to be criminal.
2016-09-28 14:27:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by ilsa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Conservatives think abstinance is a viable option for young people. Yet, the age children first have sex has continually gone down for years. Liberals aren't really pro-abortion. Abortions are an unfortunate side-effect of kids having sex without condoms or birth control creating an unwanted pregnancy. The current administration opposes teaching children about safe sex in favor of the old ineffective abstinence argument. So, conservatives are indirectly increasing unwanted pregnancies thus increasing abortions.
2007-02-07 23:34:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
As far as "killing" innocent babies..well..that's not Liberal..it's choice and if one of those "spared"rapists had his way with you,I think you would become quite the baby killer yourself or as you put it..a vampire.I think if I didn't have the choice,I would much rather the murderer be released than the rapist.At least then I wouldn't have to live with someone else's choice.But that's just my theory.
2007-02-08 01:01:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by jen_n_tn 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I say that this question is full of bias or ignorance. Or both.
If you want an actual answer, some liberals are pro choice because they believe that the parents should have a choice in carrying and bringing up a child. There are a variety of reasons why a person might choose abortion over other options, although I highly doubt that one of those reasons happens to be that people enjoy getting abortions.
2007-02-07 23:29:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by azyouthinkweiz 1
·
12⤊
1⤋
"One word CHOICE is all I have to say." That didn't really look like an answer to your question to me. If I choose to rob a convenience store and kill the employee, isn't that my CHOICE? The innocence of children is the closest thing to perfection we have. It figures they want to suck their blood.
2007-02-07 23:56:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Okay, what's the reason YOU want to SAVE babies?
I got it: you believe in COMPULSORY PREGNANCY: that women should be forced into having babies no matter what. That they should put up with kids they were never taught how to deal with, that they should lose their careers and futures because someone else told them what they can and can not do.
Liberals believe in human rights. Not an undeveloped embryo's rights. And cons are sorely lacking in either anyway
2007-02-07 23:33:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
Please identify a "guy" who "liberals" have spared that has "rape(d) and murder(ed)" "innocent babies."
Or are you one of those people who are really not interested in getting an answer but rather just wants to see the words "Liberals pro-baby killing" on the web.
2007-02-07 23:43:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Timothy B 3
·
5⤊
2⤋