Redeploy? Are the words "cut & run" in there somewhere?

Question

A Dem by any other name still wants to cut & run.

Answer 1

I just love it.
Someone answered your question with " a Democrat would not let the war become a reality".

Do not call them DEMOCRATS. They are SOCIALISTS.
.
You are totally correct. They would still be at the U.N. whining because Saddam has broken 137,075 U.N. resolutions. Each stating he must show proof he has destroyed the weapons of mass destruction he says he has. There are also 235 resolutions stating he must stop flying his aircraft in the no fly zone and he has done nothing to stop that and other atrocities.

THANK GOD WE DO NOT HAVE A SOCIALIST PRESIDENT.

I heard a democrat called a republican and all those who want to remain in Iraq cowards. John Hines Kerry stated he knew what that person meant. So did I, he called the members of congress who refuse to stab the President and the military in the back cowards.

I served 10 years in the U.S. Navy. Do not betray my troops.

Answer 2

I am In Iraq and my tour of duty will be over in around 20 months. If a Republican wins I will sign for more years if a Dem wins I will let it expire and have made some plans to join an American task group that is staying behind in Iraq. So if they "cut and Run" a few of Americas Best plan on staying behind, Like the Flying Tigers and the American Escadrille (in Reverse)

Answer 3

We need to stay the course in Iraq just as we did in Germany and Japan after WW2. We need to be their for the next 50 years. Cut and Run is all over what the Democrats are calling for. They shoudl have known when they voted for the invasion of Iraq that if we go in we do it for the long haul. Does anyone remember how many soldiers we lost in WW2? 430,000. And we lost 10,000 in just one battle. Did we cut and run then? NO we did not. We only lost 3,000 soldiers in this war to date. In comparison to WW2 that is still a bargain. Should we redeploy? Yes, we need to redeploy more troops into Iraq until the violence has finished. We need to be at a troop strength of 500,000 in Iraq and then their will be enough forces to win the peace. If we keep doing things piecemeal, then we are sending our soldiers to die. If we truly support our troops, then we will give them what they need and more to win.

Answer 4

A Dem would never have allowed this war on Iraq to become a reality. Cut & run is a Neocon word used against all Americans to make us feel like we are weak. But at least we are capable of free independant thought and are in touch with reality. Republicans and esp. the Neocons are like brainwashed sheep, that would follow anyone their party offered them. I don't know how these mindless so called Americans came about, but I would rather die than be one.

Answer 5

Hopefully you're answering from Iraq. Spend 2 years there w/ a 6 mo break in bwt. and see if you still like staying the course. I just love when people are so hypocritical that they actually have the audacity to say we should stay in Iraq while they lounge on their sofa in the comfort of their home.

Answer 6

Yes, definitely. And that would deliver a message to terrorists worldwide that we do not have the stomach to keep up the fight. And that is definitely not the message we want to be sending. It also dishonors all of those soldiers who died in that conflict, as well as those who are maimed for life.

Although I do not approve of our battleplan so far, I do believe we need to stay commited to the war.

Answer 7

seeing the animation of hillary's pie hole on the news about 'pulling out' tells me im definately not voting for her regardless of her stances on anything else.
edit: myself. 3k casualties over 5+ years is a drop in the bucket for a war if you havent noticed history. We still maintain with an all volunteer force. We need to be ready to face Iran. We havent seen sh!t yet there and we need to see this through.

Answer 8

We/ve already lost over three thousand fine americans over there. Just how many more would YOU sacrifice John Wayne?