English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. No one has ever massacred people with Nuke but USA
2. Sovets have their own Chernobil
3. In recent times Iran never attacked a country
4. Israel already has it - and has shown in recent past taht it invades neutral territories for dinner ( Suez canal/six day war/ Golan occupation/ now lebenese invasion)

I dont c why a rogue nation like Israel ( which has no respect fr any international protocol ) can have it - even north korean with efficient delivery systems an have it and not Persians??????Why??

2007-02-07 18:53:47 · 15 answers · asked by nishant s 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Why have a nuke? Iran has no future if they play hard ball they will lose, no one will respect those terroristic minded third world mentality people? Do you think China or Russia will be afraid of Iran? Come on wake up? eh? They need to shut their ugly mouths and get teeth and mouthwash better yet soap? And then with a clean body they may have a clean mind? They treat their people terrible and their women with no respect, what in the world? they should be building a good system for the future of all those babies they keep having and don't feed. Build good water systems, and toilets for Gods sake. They live in squaller like pigs, the public does, not the rich and the elite, but the public. And you want those war mongering jerks who can't even provide a clean diaper for their babies, and or good medical? you think they should have a nuke? See a Doctor a Psychiatrist please before it is too late! In our country we worked for what we have, we did not get diddly from those sand grabbing terrorists, we fought here and civilized 200 yrs ago we don't need them now and we sure don't need them now if they try and hold back our progress or anyone elses with the destructive intentions they do have like the feeble minds that they are we will destroy them with out a blink! And God bless Israel forever! We believe in equal rights and freedom. We have to still fight in America and then we have to fight over a religious fanatical belief that invades our country to push their crap on us? Come on we don't want them here to do that? We don't want Catholics, Jews, Buddhists etc., any religion to do that, we don't are what religion anyone has just keep it to yourselves, and stop hurting people in the name of God and using it as an excuse because they want what we have. Go fight in their own countries and stay there and stop blaming others for something they created all by their lonesome selves. We helped all those God Damned countries and we are not going to help them anymore and that is for sure. No more good semaritans, over in America, that WTC incident catastrophy cured us from feeling sorry for any of them and truthfully that is about 70 % of our people here right now. We are sick and tired of being used for our lands to make money and take it home to buy guns and bombs to kill others. No no no! And I am apart of the We The People not the Politicians! We the People say to hell with all of them including Chavez in Venezuela that cochroach he can kiss our royal behinds forever and anyone that looks like him too.

2007-02-07 19:31:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Your use of the term, "rogue nation" when referring to Israel shows your bias before we even start answering the question. Your further revision of history when speaking of Israel's role in the Suez Canal, Six Day War, and Golan Heights is alos suspect. Remember that Egypt played the key role in the Suez Canal, the Israel was threatened and destroyed the Arab armies in the Six Day War and that Syria used the Golan for strategic reasons and is therefore denied that land for attacks.

I guess it sucks to lose to Israel, huh?

Just because Iran HASN'T attacked doesn't mean that it WON'T attack. It has already threatened to wipe Israel off the map so there is a good reason to worry.

The US hasn't threatened to wipe anyone off the map.

Iran doesn't need a nuke when it can easily influence the world with oil.

2007-02-07 19:13:42 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Iran DOES need nuclear power. So far they've been counting only on petroleum for their electricity needs, but there aren't endless amounts of oil in Iran. It is estimated that if new sources of petroleum aren't discovered, the amount they have so far will be enough only for the next 80 years. So nuclear power is a good alternative. For what I heard on the news recently Iran allowed a commission of the Non-Aligned Movement member countries to investigate what they are doing and so far Iran has never refused an investigation by the International Agency for Atomic Energy. So far there isn't a solid proof of Iran developing nuclear weapons. The problem of Bush though is that there isn't a solid proof of Iran not developing nuclear weapons too. Anyway if the USA takes some further steps towards Iran at that level (cause a war for example), that could be pretty much classified as unfair, having in mind that countries like Israel and Pakistan have nuclear power too, and they haven't even signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty like Iran did in 1968.

2007-02-07 19:10:48 · answer #3 · answered by Victory 4 · 0 0

Because Israel must remain the only nuclear power in the Middle East,in order to serve US interests there...And if Iran doesn't have nukes ,US or Israel won't be afraid of attacking it...So the main reason why Iran can't have nukes would be hypocrisy...
North Korea doesn't threaten Israel's position in the Middle East,so there is no problem there...
Agree we should be more concerned about what Israel is doing right now,then search for imaginary reasons to attack Iran...Just look at what happened yesterday with the Lebanese army.Again Israelis have entered the Lebanese territory and they were fired upon,this time by the Lebanese army...

2007-02-07 19:15:52 · answer #4 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1 0

Your # 1 is true, however, you neglected to state that the U.S. was under attack at Pearl Harbor.

Your # 2 doesn't mention that Chernobil was more than a little mishap, they poisoned their own people.

Your # 3 is false because Iran sponsors terrorists (PROVEN) and they would use it in a split second on the U.S. - Israel -India, England, Austrailia and any country that they decided to just because they are infidels. Just listen to them chant "Death to America". Watch Al Jezerra.

Imagine - when the nukes hit there will no longer be food as you cant grow it anymore, (therefore no animals will eat or live either) there will be no water as it will be contaminated and those that dont burn up from the nukes, will eventually die from radiation poisoning or starvation. Oh, and because the wind carries the radiation, who knows what other countries will be poisoned, perhaps the radiation will land right on top of Tehran.

Your # 4 tells me who u r. (u gave urself away) so nothing I said even matters.

2007-02-07 19:32:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because Bush is driving a hate campaign against Muslims. First Afghanistan, then Iraq and now he's desperate to go and shag Iran. Bush is not even internally sorry for the whole 9/11 thing. Bush hated Muslims and for him, the 9/11 event was the perfect excuse to go barging into placesch have not even harmed him in any way. Bush's excuse to go into Afghanistan was to find Osama...He ended up destroying the country,getting it to change to a government that would be on his side,oh, and where is Osama now?Bush's excuse to go to Iraq was to confiscate weapons that he himself had traded with Iraq. He ended up changing the government to one that would be on his side, getting Saddam hanged. Did anybody notice the fact that Bush was behind the whole death of Saddam thing...and then when he got his wish...Bush told reporters that though he was happy that an evil dictator had gone down, he had nothing to do with Saddam going down. And Bush would now like to go to f**k Irans nuke system. I think that he has forgotten that fact that his own country possesses the world most deadly nuclear bomb. And the fact that probably every country posseses nucklears mainly because they would like to protect themselvess from motherf*****s like Bush. And no other country had ever used nuclear weapons except for America and that is where everybody eldse got their nuke ideas from.And Iraq agrees to regular checkups whenever and wherever. Bush is a turd and his moms a hoe and his dad is a c**k. I wish Bush would would go and try to invade North Korea and get whipped big time by those tight koreans. And I wish soembody drooped a nuke on Bush. And I wish that Bush dies. TODAY.

2007-02-07 20:24:56 · answer #6 · answered by unclassified_yeti_smurf 1 · 0 0

Giving nukes to Iran would the worlds greatest tragedy. I saw footage of them stoning women to death hanging minors. Iran is the most inhumane country out there and humankind would be in serious trouble if Iran aquired nukes. Iran only wants nukes so it can destroy Isreal. Israel has had nukes for a while and never attacked no1 with.

2007-02-07 19:38:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iran does not care relating to the Palestinians. It cares approximately interior reach administration, and it cares approximately spreading the Islamic revolution. at present - Israel is interior the way of its targets. If Iran gets nuclear weapons it would maximum in all probability use its effect to take over Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Egypt (it already has Lebanon under administration). Getting Israel out of ways might make it much less complicated for Iran to take over the different international locations

2016-11-02 21:04:44 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Israel was attacked in the 6 day war Golan and the lebenese. When have they recntly invaded unprovoked. Iran would do better for its people to look at civil rights and not putting a woman to death for being raped. They talk about the destuction of Israel and America in their government. We talk about hoping to change their policies. They talk about killing enough Americans to change our government.

2007-02-07 22:04:50 · answer #9 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0 1

Because they wave them around threatening to blow other countries off the map. Nukes, if anything at all, should be a deterrent to violence on one's own home-turf... not a lethat weapon used against another country.

The U.S., the first to use it as such learned that lesson in 1945.. nonetheless, it DID help bring WW2 to a close.

2007-02-07 20:00:37 · answer #10 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers