what do you think was O.J.'s REAL story? be honest, please?

Question

what really happened, in your opinion, to nicole simpson and ron goldman in brentwood on that fateful night? why would o.j. take a flight into chicago, stay at a motel near the airport for one night, then go back to LA in the morning? why did he drive his SUV all over LA's highways upon his return? tell me, what do you think happened?

do you think that o.j. did the dirty deed? why so? why not?

are you like i am, of the opinion, based on what i know about murder from reading so many true crime books and watching forensic files, etc., that a murdered simply cannot stand not telling what he's done, all of his life?

do you think that o.j. decided to tell the world how he "would have" done it, if he had, based on his need to unload his guilt?

tell me what you think about the evidence, too, please...

if he is guilty, then that is the crime of our last century!

what do you think?

no, i meant a MURDERER not being able to keep the murder to himself! i didn't mean the murdered! how would they talk anyhow, lol!

i don't know this: was "the glove" that did not fit made of leather? if o.j. wore the glove to practically cut off nicole's head, then blood, or water to wash it off, would certainly have shrunken the glove. what kind of glove was it? why do you think that it not fitting o.j.s hand was evidence that he did not do it?

Answer 1

Of course he did it. All the significant evidence point that direction, and he had plenty of motive. What motive would "the real killers" have had?

As to Mark Fuhrman and the planting of the glove. Furhman may be a racist and a liar, but that doesn't make him inexperienced, stupid, and incapable of finding incriminating evidence. At the time Fuhrman found the glove, he couldn't possibly have known where Simpson was. It was quite possible for him to have an airtight alibi. Maybe Simpson was the guest speaker that night at a country club dinner. No one knew where Simpson was. For him to plant evidence without knowing exactly where Simpson was and when would have been taking the gamble of a lifetime that would have destroyed his career and his life if something went wrong. What would have been his motive? How much gain could he have gotten out of it? (And there's also the possibility that the real killer would have been caught very quickly. Again, Fuhrman has destroyed his own life rather than Simpson's.) Framing is something you do with much careful forethought, not on the spot by the seat of your pants.

In his book "The Run of His Life," journalist Jeffrey Toobin tells a very interesting story. On the flight back from Chicago, Simpson sat next to some guy who recognized him and he struck up a conversation with him. This guy swore under oath that on that flight, Simpson told him that his ex-wife and a friend of hers had been murdered in a garden area right outside her front door. This is interesting because at that point the police had not told Simpson that anyone but his ex-wife had been murdered, and no one had told him where the murders had taken place. Why didn't this come out at the trial? The prosecution thought that their case was such a slam dunk that they didn't bother to introduce a number of incriminating facts, thinking they were unnecessary.

Answer 2

DID IT! We did the run around the golf course to his house from the site under 10 min! He gets home goes to Kato's(guest house) and takes a shower That is why they never found any blood in his bedroom! The court case was less about 2 people killed in cold blood and about getting OJ off! Come on we all remember the Hertz ads he did running thur the airport. In Hollywood money = get away with murder. Plus his daughter said she might have heard his voice. The glove did not fit? GIVE ME A BREAK!

I am always reading case file books on the crime library every day. Read the Black Dahlia Files. They go into the corruption in the LAPD, it is still going on. Some how the blood got lost. And the drive?? Why did he go running from the cops? And then a slap in our faces? He writes a book saying how he MIGHT have done it??
Oh and my dad worked his victory party jerk still owes us money!

Answer 3

In my opinion he did it.... the way in which is wife was killed suggested more than a random act of violence..

..... the only reason this man didn't end up behind bars was because of the nice hand selected jury....

this probably is the crime of our century ..it is not often that all evidence and logic point to an individual in a crime...and they walk away free as a bird.........

Answer 4

O.J. Simpson is very likely a murderer who got away with it...his defense attorneys were worth their weight in gold...the prosecution dropped the ball...the available evidence points to him, though

Answer 5

He did it. He loved controlling her. In the end, he took the ultimate control by taking her life. Ron Goldman was unfortunate, collateral damage. OJ didn't carve Ron up the way he did Nicole. He just killed Ron because he happened to be there when he was killing Nicole.

Answer 6

He probably did it. I think he lost it during argument as he mentions in his book (leaked manuscript). And he also think it wasn't his fault because he thinks that his wife was going crazy. Stuff in his book actually matches every evidence presented during actual trial. And I doubt that's because he did research into his court case. He knows what happened and still believes it isn't his fault even if he killed them.

I think his decision to write that book shows his inability to make sound decision like the one he made to kill those two.

Answer 7

I think he did it. He got all that evidence thrown out cause of those imbilcile police officers, if they'd followed protocol - he would have been convicted. BTW did u hear if they gonna cancel that book

Answer 8

I think the whole OJ thing was old ten years ago.

Answer 9

I agree with you that he can't stand not saying something.