2007-02-07 17:03:44 · 9 answers · asked by Matty G 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Jade HAhahahaha that was so funny good answer
Thumbs up bud.
2007-02-07 17:24:56 · update #1
Jason HAhahahaha that was so funny good answer
Thumbs up bud.
2007-02-07 17:25:42 · update #2
You all have deep philosphys
But even the answer that replyed simply "Yes" was actually deep if you really think Philosophy.
"Yes" is the answer simply put
2007-02-07 17:30:26 · update #3
You all have deep philosphys
But even the answer that replyed simply "Yes" was actually deep if you really think Philosophy.
2007-02-07 17:31:37 · update #4
You all have deep philosphys
But even the answer that replyed simply "Yes" was actually deep if you really think Deep..
2007-02-07 17:32:01 · update #5
this comes close to by far the stupidest question
2007-02-07 17:09:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I tend to think that far...is the distance the eye could see. Of course this would mean different things when you are looking up into the sky, then when you are on the ground looking across land, or the ocean.
Close is what I consider to be a distance that you could travel to within an hour. By car, bike, or foot.
How about you? Too close is when somebody enters your personal zone, and you sense it.
How about you?
2007-02-08 01:12:00 · answer #2 · answered by Dave 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Interesting philosophical question... seeing one like this for the first time... here is my STAR for you.
Far and close are relative terms.... before the event, the dividing line keeps shifting and gets firmed up only eventually... it's only after the event that one can conclusively know where the line lay. More often than not, our initial understanding does not prove to be right in the end.... that is perhaps good for us, because this uncertainty makes us attempt bigger things than we could otherwise do.
2007-02-08 01:25:39 · answer #3 · answered by small 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-08 01:10:05 · answer #4 · answered by Voodoid 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like many other things, it's a matter of perception.
2007-02-11 04:12:42 · answer #5 · answered by presence 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All things are connected and so all is one. Therefore distance is irrelevant.
2007-02-11 18:19:22 · answer #6 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is all relative to the objects involved...
2007-02-08 01:11:33 · answer #7 · answered by sugarpacketchad 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Far is too close, yet close is too far.
2007-02-08 01:12:21 · answer #8 · answered by vineyardtech 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
don't be ridiculous!
Answer: eternally far and close
2007-02-08 01:17:27 · answer #9 · answered by Miguel Angel R 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋