English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

no

2007-02-07 16:37:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'd say the one on which you used Nair. Nair dissolves hair down to the skin line and slightly below; epilation yanks it out by the roots (and some of those won't grow back at ALL).

2007-02-08 00:45:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the naired one will because i can tell you from personal experience that your epilated arm will take about a week or two to grown back but your naired arm will grow in about 5 days

2007-02-08 00:42:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anna 2 · 0 0

The Naired arm. That cuts the hair off at the skins surface. The epilady rips it out from the roots. OUCH!

You're brave!

2007-02-08 00:39:23 · answer #4 · answered by Aimee 3 · 0 0

I think the hair will grow quicker than your arm does. My arm grew back in 5 days.

2007-02-08 00:40:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

the naired arm

2007-02-08 00:38:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

naired arm

2007-02-08 00:42:21 · answer #7 · answered by rajan naidu 7 · 1 0

They should be the same, considering the roots of the hairs would have been removed if both procedures were done properly.

2007-02-08 00:39:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

the epilated one..by the way,,that hurts!

2007-02-08 00:37:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

non

2007-02-08 00:38:33 · answer #10 · answered by EddY 2 · 0 0

Well why don't you wait and find out!

2007-02-08 01:06:06 · answer #11 · answered by with The Vicious 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers