it`s wrong;women have been loose since I remember in the seventies they started to dress slutty;it`s no new thing and God is not gonna keep allowing this loose behavior very long.The same thing happened in the roaring twenties and then the stock market crashed;people became humble;then we had a world war;so you tell me if it`s only a matter of time for God`s judgment.
2007-02-07 15:20:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Depends on what you mean by sexy. If it's a short short skirt and she's not wearing underwear while her chest is practically falling out, then it could land her in trouble.
It reminds me of a Muslim woman I knew in college. She would wear long sleeved shirts that were loose as well as loose skirts while covering up her hair. (The religion requires that women cover certain body parts.) She was accused of dressing provocatively, wearing tight shirts and skirts. Considering that when I saw her that the clothes she wore were often loose or too large, I honestly wondered what they were thinking.
I then saw a girl on a train about a year ago wearing 3 inch thick heels, fishnets, a skirt and a tight, torn t-shirt that clearly showed off her bra straps as well as bra closing in the back. I don't know whether her outfit could be called "sexy" (you had to be there to see it...), but I wondered if she knew or cared the message her clothing sent, and that some people (men or women) might be stupid enough to have fun and try to snap her bra strap.
Clothes do present to the world first impressions, which are very important. That's why during job interviews you're urged to dress professionally/conservatively. If you don't care what sort of message you send that's fine, but how people interpret your clothing is not always up to you.
2007-02-07 23:24:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bookworm 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
I really believe there is a difference between sexy, and slutty. Assuming you mean slutty clothes, yes slutty clothes can land women in trouble. When some men see a woman in slutty clothes they assume she is a slutty person and therefore easily available. Women should realize that if they dress like a slut there is a chance that they will be treated as one. If I dressed like a Klansman and went for a walk in the 9th ward I would probably get my but kicked. I'm not a Klansman, but if I ever decide to dress that way I shouldn't be surprised if I get an undesirable reaction.
2007-02-07 23:31:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by p_doell 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do sexy clothes land men in trouble? and why?
Yes if a man wears something low cut and revealing I'm liable to get the hot wax out and strip off those nasty chest hairs.
2007-02-15 23:10:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by kmv 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course.
But sometimes that's what women want - trouble.
This is how the species lives on to the next generation.
The issue is really how much trouble is SHE responsible
for, and how much trouble is HE responsible for.
By law, a woman can show up naked and this does
not justify any inappropriate action on his part (though
we do have decency laws which would make her
guilty of breaking other laws).
The world does not work by law, however. Women
have been raped for less.
It behooves women to know that the world is filled
with men who cannot control themselves and are
idiots.
She may be legally and morally right, but that is
not much satisfaction in rape and abuse.
2007-02-07 23:25:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Elana 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well, revealing immodest clothes give a wrong message to others (unless they are soliciting for business and it's the message they choose to send) about a person's morals. Loose and careless about modesty lessens the odds that there's chastity, meekness, humbleness, a quiet spirit, or more mature unselfish moral beauty on the inside. Sadly, many are simply not trained in the art of being modest women so follow the harlotry of most of Hollywood's trends.
That is not to say that a woman who dresses improperly should in any way be molested. Certainly there aren't too many modestly dressed women who are faithful wives and stay out of places of ill-repute (i.e. bars, parties, etc.) which end up getting raped. (It is possible I'm sure but the odds are way less as rapists seldom patrol churches for their next victim.)
But, rapists are always to blame for their own actions as they existed long before women were even allowed to reveal so much of their bare skin or the form of their bodies to the general public. It is wrong for women to incite lust in men though. Even so, people are drawn away of their own lusts but definitely sexy means seductive so that means they want men to look at them as sex objects. Seems rather demeaning to me but this adulterous generation was prophesied that seducing spirits should wax worse and worse.
2007-02-07 23:48:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lovin' Mary's Lamb 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
well. it depends. do you mean actually sex-appeal or whore-ish. Sexy I think not because i dress somewhat sexy, but if the attitude behind the sex-appeal is correct, such as acting smart and sophisticated and making it clear that you aren't easy, it won't land anyone in trouble. If you give the attitude of a slut, then you are asking for trouble
2007-02-07 23:34:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥Monkeys 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
. there is a world of difference between slutty and sexy.....
Men are responsible for their actions they have a choice.
You could dress like a nun and some pervert could find it attractive,and land a woman in trouble?
People are always blaming others for their choices........
and their consequences
2007-02-13 08:17:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by tennessee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think rapist are gonna do it any but the clothes gets there attention and ups thier odds of attack , even by 1st time rapist...those bastards
2007-02-08 00:13:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by x69bw21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on where they go.
2007-02-07 23:17:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋