that happened to me a while ago too..i dont have a clue either
2007-02-07 15:05:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by »-(¯`v´¯)-» BLAH くろ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
To answer your question, no I have not seen lots of Red Crosses while looking at P/S in the avators.
2007-02-07 15:06:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by jrealitytv 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Apparently, the photos are not loading for you. That could be due to your connection speed or some malfunctioning servers near you. Try right-clicking on where the photos should be and click on Show Picture.
2007-02-07 15:08:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
there are a number of different overview websites and quite some different evaluations... i these days observed interior the present PCWorld magazine a score of loose anti-viruses ... I would desire to declare i think of its especially precise ... uncertain in the event that they rated AVG... yet whilst it became (the rankings have been a million to 5 ... appropriate to worst) than AVG could be #6 (in different-wards, no longer even on the checklist) a million) Avast - I would desire to declare on my 8year previous laptop it became fairly sluggish yet on my @ a million and a million/2 year previous Toshiba with Windows7, that's a-ok .... superb Detection Too 2) Avira - that's what I even have on my previous laptop and what I had (attempting Avast on my new Toshiba ATM) on my new pc earlier attempting Avast.... i admire Avira and whether i'm making use of Avast ... I nonetheless propose Avira one hundred% ... Detection in basic terms somewhat in the back of Avast ... they deducted "factors" for the certainty they like Avast's Interface greater effective 3) MS SE - I would desire to declare i do no longer believe MS, yet I would desire to given in and say all of the comments are very constructive .. i do unlike the way it forces you to have abode windows updates on "acquire and set up immediately" .. or appropriate out of the "field"/"gate"/in spite of .. I had to place in 60MB of updates ON ideal of the i think of it became 12MB for the Anti-virus itself ... yet for beginners that somewhat do unlike Avast, or Avira for in spite of reason ... that's a good decision.. different than for 1 attempt that rated 50% detection and Avira rated 70%, MS SE is on par with Avira Detection sensible .... Did MS finally get some thing appropriate?... They slender down there database and allow you to substitute the abode windows replace settings whilst MS SE is set up... i might say one hundred% confident 4) Panda - Cant undergo in suggestions too lots approximately this 'overview" 5) Comodo's AV - no longer just about as good as any of the others (no longer counting ... probable AVG), yet "honest detection" those are all loose, yet once you sense the would desire to go with to pay for one (for in spite of reason), attempt Eset NOD32 ... its the only non-loose anti-virus i elect to propose and it did no longer even lag my older structures ... laptop specifications would variety, so i'm no longer likely to declare it won't lag yours, even though it in all probability won't additionally i might run Malwarebytes and SuperAntispyware (2 loose and bonafide anti-malware kit) on the laptop and clearly eliminate that "pink flow antivirus" -Xmetalfanx
2016-12-17 05:00:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No problem here in US. Just those AU folks, maybe.
2007-02-07 15:04:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It must be your computer.....it's not happening to me.
2007-02-07 15:06:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by lm 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's just your computer.... Mine isn't doing that..
2007-02-07 15:04:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by abbas_n_chantel 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see any, it's just you
2007-02-07 15:05:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No -- haven't seen it
2007-02-07 15:55:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lolitta 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
not on mine.I want to see them too.
2007-02-07 15:04:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋