Greta Van Whatever, Lawyer? and not covering the trial no mention...bizarre..not to mention Hannity spending forever on nancy's proposed travel requirements but zich on Bush budget. Its as if SCOOTER LIBBY never existed.
2007-02-07 14:01:42 · 12 answers · asked by meldorhan 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They were too busy exposing Obama as a radical Muslim. LOL. They have absolutely no business calling themselves a news channel.
2007-02-07 14:06:20 · answer #1 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 8⤊ 6⤋
Scooter Libby. Is that a of pile of stinking Republican dung? Howard Stern. Is that a pile of stinking Zionist dung? Anna Nicole Smith. Is that a woman who had to stay via the few skill she had accessible? which incorporates getting screwed via a ninety 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous Jew? no man or woman ought to ought to attempt this except a ninety 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous Jewish female.and she or he does it because she likes it, yet what youthful female ought to have slept with that sketch of an Egyptian mummy? I do not forget that each and each man or woman conservatives stay into their previous due 80s or 90s yet with slightly of success once you all die you flow to a sparkling black area not occupied via humanity. besides, Scooter, would not a classic man or woman supply that call to a canines? Oh I forgot he's a Republican expendable. Run away little Scooter, your carry close is coming and he has a gun!
2016-12-03 21:18:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This wasn't hard to find.
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Feb07/0,4670,CIALeakWitnesses,00.html
I notice that all Fox News is doing here is reporting what various witnesses said/testified.
That's what reporting is supposed to do. Unlike CBS, NBC, CNN, ABC and MSNBC, Fox hasn't declared Libby guilty or not guilty, they're just reporting here what was said during the trial.
What idiot told you Fox was not covering the trial? As I said, that link wasn't difficult to find, unless of course you don't WANT to find it.
2007-02-07 14:18:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
If you don't like it, why did you watch not just one, but two shows? Is it *really* that important to you that their coverage (I heard a little, but wasn't paying attention) meet your standards?
FACT: CNN chief news executive resigned after making EXTREMELY inappropriate comments about our soldiers in Iraq. Hmm - it couldn't be a LIBERAL BIAS, now could it?
FACT: CBS and Dan Rather let their hatred of Bush override their judgment and went with the fake memo story. Gee - those conservatives in the media really got Dan, didn't they?
FACT: Los Angeles Times printed a doctored up photograph that made British soldiers look very bad. But, gee - there's no liberal bias to the media.
FACT: Retuers lost a photographer last summer after he was busted for Photoshopping pictures taken in Lebanon of supposed Israeli damage. Little hint here, guys - conservatives tend to support Israel. So where's that conservative coverage we hear so much about?.
FACT: The New York Times never came across a national secret they wouldn't print. Plus, they kept Jayson Blair, KNOWING he was making his stories up, for HOW long?
FACT: The Washington Post had a blog post recently that calls our troops "mercenaries" and implies that they are all rapists and murderers. As if this weren't bad enough, he inferred that the troops should be happy no one is spitting on them. THAT is most certainly NOT a conservative value.
Go ahead and give me the thumbs-down. I don't really care. My family has a very long and proud tradition with this country, and my relatives have spilled blood for your right to sit home in very relative luxury (don't think so? You're on a COMPUTER, aren't you? You obviously are, and have Internet access - that ain't poor. Go to Afghanistan or hell, even Mexico. THAT is poor.) Anyway, it's the blood of my family that has paid for your right to sit home and complain.
On their behalf, you're welcome.
2007-02-07 14:24:19 · answer #4 · answered by Lola 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
NBC's Russert Set to Testify for Prosecution in CIA ...
... conversation with former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and from ... to be his final witness Wednesday in Libby's perjury and obstruction trial. ...
www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250658... - 8k - 2007-02-07
CIA Leak Trial Summary - Politics | Republican Party ...
... ADVERTISEMENT. A summary of testimony from witnesses in the obstruction and perjury trial of former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby: ...
www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Feb07/0,4... - 7k - 2007-02-07
NBC Reporter to Testify at CIA Leak Case - Politics ...
... conversation with former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and from ... to be his final witness Wednesday in Libby's perjury and obstruction trial. ...
www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Feb07/0,4... - 7k - 2007-02-07
Jurors to Hear More Tapes of Libby's Grand Jury ...
2007-02-07 14:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by mamadixie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Shepard Smith covered it, talked about Tim Russert being cross examined.
I don't watch the others, so I have no idea.
2007-02-07 14:14:30 · answer #6 · answered by Lily VonSchtupp 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I noticed that too. Fair and Balanced my aching @ss.
Nope -nothing on the Faux website front page. They do have a story from the AP posted but it took a search to find it.
2007-02-07 14:05:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
Not to my knowledge. Hey, why not try the Fox network online. They have the news an it would be listed there. Just a thought.
2007-02-07 14:05:32 · answer #8 · answered by chole_24 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It is obvious you don't really watch fox (because I have seen it) just say whatever off the top of your head weather it is true or not. Jeeez...any lie to bash fox news just like any lie to bash Bush!
2007-02-07 14:29:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
They have been covering it. I've seen a few reports on it. Greta mostly does tabloid news not government stuff.
2007-02-07 14:06:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
did you really believe Fox would cover it in any depth...anything that comes out of it must be spun. there is too much to spin (insert lying) to make any attempt of Fox seem plausible
2007-02-07 14:08:23 · answer #11 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋