English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ok.. i just need a quick bit on each of these questions..

1) why did the South think the Civil War was right?
2) why did the north think it was right?

thnxez!

2007-02-07 13:39:02 · 7 answers · asked by roar 2 in Education & Reference Homework Help

7 answers

Southern opinion - because of the issue of states rights

Northern opinion - to save the union

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_the_American_Civil_War for more detail.

good luck!!!

2007-02-07 13:44:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Canadian Bacon...oh have you been misled...

The south seceded from the north not because of slavery but because of the high taxes they were having to pay. The south at that time was much richer than the north. The south was being blamed for the slavery issue, but slavery was on the way out with the invention of the cotton gin. It really all boiled down to economics.

The north on the other hand with the secession of the south was running a big deficit and facing economic ruin and depression.

There were several acts and laws passed like the Dread Scott decision and the Missouri compromise that played a part in the slavery issue and according to the north and the abolitionists was the cause of the war. It may have played a minor role.

Lincoln freed the slaves, but he had NO legal way to enforce it in the south because the south was then a separate country. This was not done however until towards the end of the war. (Typical for the USA to try and control another country...look at Iraq)

The correct name for the "civil war" should really be the "war of northern aggression" because that is what it was. But remember the one who wins the war writes the history their way.

As a side note, the northern central government has never lived up to any of the agreements made with the southern states when they were readmitted. Only Texas has reserved the legal right to again secede from the union when ever it wants by the treaty that was negotiated.

2007-02-07 13:59:10 · answer #2 · answered by pinelake302 6 · 0 0

1. In the south, the Civil War was about defending "States Rights", meaning their right to continue slavery without the union interfering.

2. In the north, the Civil War wasn't really about ending slavery, it was about putting the union back together. Although ending slavery gave the war a "high moral purpose" to many northerners, the Emancipation proclamation was only issued as part of a strategy to defeat the south by ruining its economy.

2007-02-07 13:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by ... 3 · 0 0

You know, you could take a college semester on each of those questions.
1. To the south at that time, a state was like a nation, and they had a couple of hundred years of being their state, but far less being part of the U.S.--think of the European Union, with each component having its own history.
2. The north needed the south's raw materials for its factories--and also used slavery as a way to encourage its men to fight, men fight better for a cause.

2007-02-08 03:16:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The North was fighting to abolish slavery, because it is morally wrong, and to re-unify the country after the Southern states left the Union. Northern states had freed slaves a long time before, and wanted to South to follow suit.

The South was too deep-rooted in their traditions, and too in love with raking in huge profits by not paying their workers to be told what to do by the North.

First, South Carolina left the Union, and then other southern states followed. There was basically 2 Americas at that point. That's when the war began, the North as the aggressor.

2007-02-07 13:42:26 · answer #5 · answered by Canadian Bacon 3 · 1 1

The south wanted to maintain slavery because they thought that it supported their economy and without it, it would fall. The needed more labor for cotton picking and the sort, so if they won then....you get the picture.


The north didn't think it was right but they didn't want the southern states to succeed from the union and if they had to make them not succeed, they would do whatever it takes, even by force.

2007-02-07 13:43:51 · answer #6 · answered by Lilaznboi2011 2 · 1 1

a million. fake The cotton gin greater the choose for slaves because it allowed using short staple cotton that would desire to be grown extra straightforward then different kinds. 2. fake Lincoln whether not an abolitionist, grew to become into not prepared on slavery and grew to become into antagonistic to permitting new states to be slave states. The democratic social gathering grew to become into chop up ensuing in Lincoln getting the main electoral votes, yet not getting a majority of the favored vote. 3. genuine There have been cases of violence customarily interior the border state factors, however the attack on feet Sumter is many times considered the seen image that the conflict had began. 4. fake Blockade runners have been used by the south and ecu international places to run products previous the union blockade. 5. Gettysburg grew to become right into a terriblr defeat for Lee and often cases considered the turning component of the conflict. 6. genuine at the same time as in no way convicted, sales area is considered to be the murderer of Lincoln 7. fake The north grew to become into outraged related to the assassanation. The union grew to become into reconstructed, yet with extensive quantities of bitterness on the two aspects.

2016-09-28 14:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers