English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Before the Iraq war, millions of people around the world were asking for proof of the reasons the US and it's coalition of the confused wanted to invade Iraq. That proof was never provided to the world and for a good reason, there was no proof. So now a few years later, Iraq is in a civil war and tens of thousands of innocent people are dead and still dying. In just January alone, there were1802 Iraqis who were killed. If the US hadn't been so eager to invade an independent sovereign nation illegally, this civil war would not be happening and these people would not be dying. The US and it's puppet government in Iraq hung the only guy who was able to control the country.
So I ask you, if you voted for Bush, do you feel any guilt for the deaths of these innocent Iraqis? If that blood isn’t only on Bush's hands and the hands of his hired mercenaries in US Army, Navy Air force and Marine uniforms, isn't it on your hands too?

2007-02-07 13:35:56 · 6 answers · asked by Author Unknown 6 in News & Events Current Events

tuttiphuckingfruitti- There were no WMDs in Iraq. No nukes, no stockpiles of chemicals, no bio weapons, nothing. You were lied to by the government.
If there was chem. weapons found in Iraq, Bush would have been standing on the top of the Capitol builds dome yelling “WE FOUND THEM, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD WE FOUND THEM”. He didn't.

2007-02-07 14:14:43 · update #1

6 answers

Luckily, I never voted for the tyrant!

2007-02-07 13:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I didn't vote for him either time, but I knew things were gonna get bad. My dog was poisoned the day the Shrub was "elected" the first time. That was definitely a bad omen. Of course, I didn't think the SOB was going to start Gulf War II: Iraq Revisited. It's funny how until 9/11 everyone said there weren't any WMDs in Iraq, but then mysteriously came up with evidence after 9/11, yet when we invaded the WMDs had vanished into thin air. That's one heck of a magic trick. Think Saddam had David Copperfield on his payroll?

2007-02-08 00:46:49 · answer #2 · answered by Laoshu Laoshi 5 · 0 0

Luckily i didn't vote for him... but i hope eventually makes the right decision about somethings... as an American Citizen i do feel bad though... we tried to take Iraq apart to make it better... now we can't seem to get it back together again! I don't think its fair to call the men and women of our Armed Forces mercenaries... they are men and women that are willing to die for others freedoms.. that may not be why they joined, but thats the reason so many lay six feet under today! I mean really with all the people that hate everything American, the U.S military is the reason you can sleep at night... But I do think that Bush should feel the guilt for the situation, him and those that mislead him... You can not blame people's naivity the blame lies on those who put the information out!

2007-02-07 21:44:28 · answer #3 · answered by ms.jackson... 4 · 2 0

I Held my nose and voted for the guy,more so against the other guy.It is the wrong war at the wrong time ,but we need to stop these maniacs some place,We should not let them spread out all over the world,The fools in the white house now are to weak to do the job right.If we tell them privately next time we will hit your rock,and then every other holly place you have ,then it will stop,or they will get a nuke in every country there.They want blood let them taste there own.4000 years of insanity can only be cured in this way.

2007-02-07 22:36:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

uummm...no. hussein did a lousy job "controlling" iraq. which, coincidentally, was in blatant violation of every order the un had given it, along with france and germany, who were engaged in illegal trade with iraq. a large store of chemical weapons was found in iraq, though it did take a while for them to turn up. there just wasn't much coverage in the mainstream media about it. i guess they are too attached to their "no wmd's" shtick to let it go, even in the face of the truth. as far as the dead of iraq go, here's the deal: some people have to die for the freedom of their homelands. that's what happens in war. and i'll bet a good number of those who have died would have been rounded up and killed, or worse, by hussein's men by now anyway. at least they died fighting for a better country for their families, instead of dying on the whims of a power-crazed madman. i would also like to know why you assume the iraqis that have died were all "innocents". in a land where eight year olds are recruited to shoot american soldiers and women strap bombs to their babies in efforts to get close enough to our guys to blow them up without raising suspicion, i have a hard time believing there is too much innocence floating around. if you think we're so wrong, go on over to iraq and help the poor innocent iraqis defend themselves. see how far you get. i'll bet the decapitated missionaries can give you a list of hotels to stay in during your trip.

2007-02-07 21:54:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Whew, I sure didn't!

2007-02-07 22:50:37 · answer #6 · answered by Sick Puppy 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers