YA BUT U HAFTA REMEMBER HE DID LEAVE HIS FIRST GIRL PREGO FOR SPEARS AND HIS OTHER KID, HE WAS SELF SERVING, HES ARROGANT AND DID SPEARS DIRTY TOO TO GET HIMSELF DIVORCED, IM NOT ON HER SIDE EITHER BECAUSE .......WELL IT ALL SPEAKS FOR ITSELF! LOL I ALMOST THINK THEY DESERVE EACH OTHER LOL
2007-02-07 13:38:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by shannonlee05@sbcglobal.net 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm on neither side. Britney and Kevin are both craving for fame and attention from the media. Britney is irresponsible and lacks the qualities of being a good mother. Kevin appears to be only interested in himself and money.
2007-02-07 13:57:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by hdwong58 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
They are both in the wrong- kevin federline did leave his pregnant fiance - so what - if the relationship just isnt working then its not fair on any of the parties involved including the children to flog a dead horse so to speak.
Britney is a b.i.t.ch for even suggesting the childrens father disappears - she made her bed and she should lie in it. Oh and what kind of mother is she anyway? she should spend time with her own children rather than slagging her childrens father off - the words GROW UP spring to mind.
2007-02-07 21:00:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with Tracie completely. Britney knew who Kevin was when she married him in the beginning. She wanted shock value and headlines, now she got it. I think everyone is blaming Kevin for Britney's behavior/image but she cost it on herself. Yes, he left his first girlfriend, but Brit knew he was involved with Shar Jackson. I' am so sick of the poor Britney routine. Besides, How good of a mother she can be if she is partying every night and leaving the kids with the nanny. NEITHER deserves the kids.
2007-02-07 13:48:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♥♥Bree♥♥ 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Kevin did not safeguard the two childrens he has by Shar Jackson. Kevin would be unable to safeguard himself, not to point those 2 childrens. i think of he might desire to in basic terms get what he offered into the marriage, all of us be attentive to that wasn't lots. If he launch a intercourse video than he proves to us as quickly as lower back that he's not something yet a MALE GOLD-DIGGER
2016-09-28 14:06:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to say Britney. She's not acting too responsible right now, but Kevin was never there for her. He went out and partied while she was with the kids. Are we really supposed to believe he changed overnight?
2007-02-07 14:35:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Meg 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither I say push both of them into an active volcano and give custody of the Kids to Bruce Campbell
2007-02-07 13:45:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by gerbil31603 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
kevin's side. even though he left his first girl for britney at least he had her in check. cause now she is running around like a hoochie (ie. hanging around town with no panties with paris and lindsay) instead of being a mom to her two boys (sean preston and jayden james). so people should give kevin a break.
2007-02-08 03:00:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by mecarela 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You should never get so obsessed with people like them and more than half of what you read in the magazines and hear is lies. They are both nasty!
2007-02-07 13:35:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neither, they are just the typical spoiled young people of Hollywood today.They have more money than morals, and set a poor example to our young people.
2007-02-07 13:53:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by zzum 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kevin's. Everyone tried to say that he ruined her image. I think it should be pretty obvious now that she is capable of that all by herself. She is trash. I think people need to give Kevin a break.
2007-02-07 13:39:25
·
answer #11
·
answered by Tracie 4
·
4⤊
1⤋