Who has a better point 50 Cent or Cam'ron?

Question

The question that was raised that caused the beginning of the 50 vs. Cam'ron beef *if u haven't heard it yet, take a listen @ http://thesurfacenews.blogspot.com/2007/02/50-cent-argues-with-camron-styles-p.html * was is it better to be on a major label with a lot of top names (and you aren't yet established as a platinum selling artist) or to be on an independent label?

Whats your opinion?
~Please support your answers~

Answer 1

I'm siding with Cam'ron. If your not selling records like Ludacris, Nelly, Em, or 50 Cent its not wise to sign to a Major Label such as Def Jam, Interscope, or Universal. Its wrong to call Koch a graveyard company for non major emcee because everybody gotta eat major or non major... Mobb Deep, Llyod Banks Tony Yayo both had poor sell on a major (G-unit/Interscope), MOP has yet to be released. Cam’ron is now signed to Diplomats Records/Asylum $2.5 million three-year deal and he has disturibtion deals with KOCH, DEF JAM, and ASYLUM. Nowadays all major artist have a commerical pop appeal, 50 cent hasn't made gangsta music in a very long time now, songs like Candy shop, Best Friend, and Disco Inferno are bubble gum pop at best. Dipset is for the streets... Beside if you believe Koch is a graveyard why would you let your own artist (Prodigy) sign to die label

Answer 2

If you wanna sell 300,000 and make 90 cents per album, good for you. Work with 50 and Interscope. If you want to sell 300,000 and make $7-8 an album, go independant and put in the leg work. Do the math people

Answer 3

50 cent

Answer 4

I Think 50... He is making more sence