on a VERY high mountain, in a house on stilts, in the uppermost room ..actually the moon sounds a safe bet, or a sponge factory it could soak up all the water.
2007-02-07 11:31:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by alex w 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would live on a hill. But that wouldn't happen anyway because it has been worked out that even if all the glacier things melted the sea levels around the world would only rise up to 6 feet.
2007-02-07 11:13:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd still live on top of a Mountain outside of Salt Lake City, I'd just be a little closer to the beach.
2007-02-07 11:13:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by comet girl...DUCK! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd be fine where I am now, 3,000 m above sea level. I think The East of England would be in trouble though.
2007-02-07 11:13:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anywhere but in Florida! Say goodbye to Palm Beach, Miami, Jacksonville and Tampa.
2007-02-07 11:28:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by answers999 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would live where I am right now. My town is about 100 ft. above sea level.
2007-02-07 11:14:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kisses 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Underwater
2007-02-08 01:07:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by FRAN1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exactly where I am now, though I'd cook some soup for the neighbours at the bottom of the hill.
2007-02-07 11:13:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
In the middle of the sea if the flood barriers fail :-)
2007-02-07 11:16:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by grahamralph2000 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
On the hills near my home!
2007-02-09 21:37:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by jammydodger 5
·
0⤊
0⤋