English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

32 answers

on a VERY high mountain, in a house on stilts, in the uppermost room ..actually the moon sounds a safe bet, or a sponge factory it could soak up all the water.

2007-02-07 11:31:22 · answer #1 · answered by alex w 3 · 0 0

I would live on a hill. But that wouldn't happen anyway because it has been worked out that even if all the glacier things melted the sea levels around the world would only rise up to 6 feet.

2007-02-07 11:13:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd still live on top of a Mountain outside of Salt Lake City, I'd just be a little closer to the beach.

2007-02-07 11:13:33 · answer #3 · answered by comet girl...DUCK! 6 · 0 0

I'd be fine where I am now, 3,000 m above sea level. I think The East of England would be in trouble though.

2007-02-07 11:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Anywhere but in Florida! Say goodbye to Palm Beach, Miami, Jacksonville and Tampa.

2007-02-07 11:28:50 · answer #5 · answered by answers999 6 · 0 0

I would live where I am right now. My town is about 100 ft. above sea level.

2007-02-07 11:14:31 · answer #6 · answered by Kisses 5 · 0 0

Underwater

2007-02-08 01:07:29 · answer #7 · answered by FRAN1 3 · 0 0

Exactly where I am now, though I'd cook some soup for the neighbours at the bottom of the hill.

2007-02-07 11:13:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In the middle of the sea if the flood barriers fail :-)

2007-02-07 11:16:43 · answer #9 · answered by grahamralph2000 4 · 0 0

On the hills near my home!

2007-02-09 21:37:36 · answer #10 · answered by jammydodger 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers