Dont you think it will be dumb if BATISTA ends TAKER'S wrestlemania streak?

Question

I think so it would've been better if someone like HOGAN or Ric flair.But it could've been better if KANE in his third time against taker he finally beats taker.you agree?

Answer 1

yes i do it would great

Answer 2

Yes I think that would be dumb. However, I also think it would be dumb if Hogan or Flair ended it because Taker already had feuds with those two (and Hogan couldn't sell the chokeslam for $#it.) Kane, I don't mind because I see where you would be going with the "3rd time's the charm" idea. IMO I think that for you to defeat the Undertaker you have to:

1) Be undefeated at 'Mania. Edge is a good example.

2) Be a LEGIT threat to 'Taker. Randy Orton was a VERY legit threat IMO with his "Legend-Killer" status.

3) Be able to wrestle. Let's face it. If someone like Eugene were to end 'Taker's 'Mania streak, the world would explode. Chris Benoit is a good example of someone excellent in ring ability.

Well, there you go. A quick list of that "special someone" to end Taker's streak. Edge is a good candidate to do it, and if you exempt No. 1 f/ the checklist, then Chris Benoit and HBK are also good candidates. Well, let's hope Taker doesn't lose.
P.S. I'm sure he won't. Most Rumble winners go to Wrestlemania to WIN!

Answer 3

Undertaker should NEVER lose at Wrestlemania. He has beat some of the all time greats at the event and if it was made that he was to lose to someone like Batista, who has no where near the experience of the deadman and is losing his step by the day would be a mistake by WWE. When i say he should never lose at mania, i mean NEVER. Not to Hogan, Not to Flair, Not to Stone Cold, Not to The Rock, Not to anyone. When a man builds a legacy around his record at Wrestlemania, a record that is unprecedented, it wouldn't be right if at his fifteenth he lost. How would it sound when he gets into the Hall of Fame and in the introduction speech it states A man who went 14-1 at Wrestlemania (assuming 23 is his last)? I like Batista as a wrestler, but i like Undertaker more and i do NOT want to see him lose.

Answer 4

I don't think Batista will beat Taker, as much as I hate to see Batista lose, I heard from a source and whether you believe this or not, Taker doesn't pay attention to the script when it comes to Wrestlemania. He will win. And if he doesn't my bad, but I seriously doubt it, the Deadman shall reign supreme!

...::§ÄV::...

Answer 5

Yeah its really idiotic since I believe Taker should retire with the streak and Batista is nothing compared to TAKER's legacy

Answer 6

im not saying this is true but i heard taker is retiring soon and it was supposed to be kane to beat him but kane said no and if batista beats taker it would b one of vinces biggest mistakes i mean y would he do that and batista is getting slow he needs to come up with some new moves

Answer 7

Yea.. I want taker to get the titlee, i would love to see him go 15 and 0, Batista shouldnt beat him, if someone should, it should be like a legend or something.

Answer 8

It would be stupid Taker should leave with the streak and the title. They should at least let him make 15-0

Answer 9

i do because i would love to see the taker with the tittle . When was the last time he had it years ago. The taker is a really good talented wrestler and deserves the tittle.

Answer 10

Yea that would be really dumb. Taker should win, then win the raw belt somehow and retire as the greateast of all time.

Answer 11

Thye asked kane and orton but both didnt want to do it out of respect for him. but a steriod freak agreed