English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

he move to impeach President Bush has apparently stalled, but Internet investigative reporter Steve Watson sees no reason to ignore the evidence for the charges. "Remember what Bill Clinton was impeached for when reading the following 10 reasons why George W. Bush should be impeached," he says in an Infowars column, and then lists his own version of a Top Ten List, with details included:

(10) North American Union, Amnesty program, Killing sovereignty; (9) Illegal legislation / Re-writing law: Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Wiretapping; (8) UNESCO and UN treaties; (7) Destruction of the Dollar; (6) New Freedom Initiative; (5) Real ID act; (4) The lies that led us to war; (3) Buying fake news and engaging in domestic propaganda; (2) Hurricane Katrina response; and (1) 9/11: Bush personally backed the FBI off Bin Laden before 9/11.

He closes by stating, "Impeachment and indictment is the only way to go to save America and democracy. Bush is a figurehead but we need to show the world that he and his handlers are not our leaders."

2007-02-07 10:38:37 · 15 answers · asked by Andre L 1 in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

Great idea, but will never happen.

2007-02-07 10:41:23 · answer #1 · answered by Runa 7 · 1 2

It proves he's an fool and that Democrats are liars. The analyze which have regarded into the intel actuall practice the option of what Kucinich claims. The NIE became not doctored. It became (Clintonappointed) CIA chief guiding idea, not Bush, who reported it turned right into a "slam dunk" that Saddam Hussein had WMD stockpiles. Democrats in 2002 reported an same element that Bush reported; their excuse became/is "nicely, we were in basic terms following the intelligence". 2004 Senate Intelligence record shown that. different autonomous comments shown that. And now the Senate Democrats tried to make hay, yet they purely were given uncovered by technique of the Republicans for his or her hypocrisy even as the Republicans used charges from Senator Rockefellar to reveal that Democrats and Bush were holding the *same element*. Bush, and the Democrats, and foriegn intelligence organizations, *all* actual believed Saddam Hussein became harboring WMDs. And its became sparkling Saddam had deliberately cultivated that conception as a showing of potential, and it became sparkling that Saddam's WMD classes were nevertheless in existence inspite of if the stockpiles were not. the biggest lie about Iraq is the Democrat lie that Bush lied. He did not. Kucinich is only a media hound. Even i ought to assert: "representative Kucinich has acted in a way opposite to his trust as member of Congress and subversive of constitutional authorities to the bias of the reason behind regulation and justice and to the seem harm of the persons of united statesa.. Wherefore, Dennis Kucinich, by technique of such habit, is responsible of an impeachable offense warranting elimination from workplace." and that i'd be acceptable! Kucinich is a sparkling and modern-day chance to the protection and prosperity of u . s . a ..

2016-11-26 00:48:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It will never happen because the whole administration is so corrupt, just getting rid off Bush wouldn't help. You forgot personally aiding drug smugglers and the destruction of the American way of life. Bush has succeeded in destroying America more than any terrorist could.

2007-02-07 10:47:45 · answer #3 · answered by jackie 6 · 3 0

The military chiefs ( collectivly)have the power to remove the President from office if he has placed the country in danger. They are permanant protectors whilst a politician is only temporary)
I doubt whether any of them have to balls to do it either!

But you have to blame the electors and that stupid method of the College system or whatever it's called that spreads the votes for what you have got.
1 vote 1 point is the only way to have a fair election. Your system seems to favor the loser and you sure as hell got one from the last election. Reap what you sow applies in the case of Bush

2007-02-07 10:50:21 · answer #4 · answered by Shelty K 5 · 2 1

The Bush impeachment will not happen because no one is brave enough to file the case in Congress. It is all talk but no action.

2007-02-07 20:41:18 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 0

Let's just ignore him and relegate him to irrelevance. He'll be gone in less than two years a relegated to history's scrap heap, remembered only as the most incompetent president in history.

2007-02-07 10:49:45 · answer #6 · answered by Brite Tiger 6 · 1 0

1) There are no grounds for impeachment. Repeated lies are still lies.
2) I've never heard of this "reporter" before & hope I never hear of him again.

2007-02-07 13:21:52 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 1

Why you are loosing time asking questions like this? You know definitely that impeachment will never happen.

2007-02-07 11:01:19 · answer #8 · answered by VERITAS 33 3 · 0 1

democrats wil protect bush. Now we know both parties are criminal and need to be driven from power!

2007-02-07 10:44:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't recall gross incompetence as being the key trigger for impeachment.

2007-02-08 05:18:57 · answer #10 · answered by DaMan 5 · 0 1

Let them keep spinning there wheels. It will only give the GOP a better chance at making gains in the 2008 election.

2007-02-07 10:46:12 · answer #11 · answered by C B 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers