English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I get AI and gilbert

2007-02-07 10:18:45 · 20 answers · asked by dabric13 1 in Sports Fantasy Sports

20 answers

We can break it down for you actually

AI + gilbert

55.8 PPG a game with about 150-210 a week
a 44% FG over 120-160 shots a week
4 3's pg. with about 12-16 a week
82% FT with 50-70 FT's a week.
7 rebounds per game with 21-30 rebounds per week
15 assists per game with about 45-60 assists per week
7.6 t/o's a game with about 22-30 T/O's a week
4 steals a game with 12-16 steals a week.

Then add in a random player you pick up that averages 10 points per game 5 boards and 2 assists and 1.5 turnovers a game. shooting at 45% fg and 75% ft (average) with .5 steals a game. then you add that to the totals for three players.

WIth Nash/Butler/Johnson

You are getting 66ppg with about 190-260 points per week
You are getting 49% FG with 150-200 shots attempted a week
82% ft with about 42-60 attempts a week
6.2 3's per game at about 18-25 3's a week
15 rebounds a game with about 45-60 a week
19.8 assists a game with about 59-88 assists a week
9.8 T/O's a game with about 28-37 turnovers a week
4 steals a game with about 12-16 steals a week


Blocks are insignificant in this because none of the players are effective in that category

What's very significant is the 3rd person you pick up. when you make the trade

So AI and Gilbert are more efficient for FT's/Steals/Turnovers. If you pick up a pretty decent player who's averaging about 10-15 points you might even be able to take points as well. If you find someone with the ability to get 5 assists a game then you might even take assists.

But you'll lose points, 3 pointers, rebounds, fg%.

So look at what you have an weigh it together with the rest of your team. If you need what AI/GIL give you more than trade for them, otherwise dont bother.

2007-02-08 10:36:54 · answer #1 · answered by clayfu 3 · 0 0

I would not do that trade. I would wait a little longer, see how bad the Nash shoulder injury is and if it is teribble then do it but IVerson is sharing shots with Melo and the UCONN native Caron Butler is putting up all-star numbers along with Joe Johnson. I think it is even without Nash and if he is hurt bad then do it but giving up a two time MVP in addition to an even trade is not a good move. If you keep the same league next year, maybe throw in a first or second round pick depending on how the team will finish and then make the trade but not until then.

2007-02-07 12:49:27 · answer #2 · answered by Da Man 3 · 0 1

I wouldn't do that trade, cause they put up the scoring #'s for your team, but in fantasy NBA u need more than just players who can score a total of 70 PPG for u, u also need good FT shooters, guys who make lots of 3's, and boards and blocks leaders, and stealing and many other things, and u wanna have less TO's, and AI and Arenas pretty much get nothing but PTS and TO's, so I'd stick with the players u got, Nash shoots like 93% from FT Line and 12.5 APG, and all round u got better team with Nash, Butler and Johnson

2007-02-07 10:57:49 · answer #3 · answered by Bo 3 · 0 1

Caron Iverson

2016-11-06 22:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I wouldn't do a three for two like that one. you're essentially trading away Caron Butler for nothing. Nash was out last night so, who knows about that one. I'd try to get more in return or give a worse player than Butler, as you will probably never find a free agent as good as him. Either way you cut it you lose w/this trade.
Good luck bud.

2007-02-08 00:27:28 · answer #5 · answered by Mikael 2 · 0 0

To be fair this should be 2 for 2 not 2 for 3. AI and Gilbert for Nash and JJ. Thats pretty even.

2007-02-08 04:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by frigon_p 5 · 1 1

Thats a tough one without seeing the standings. If you have a free agent player that you like out there, then this option becomes more attractive. I am assuming that you have enough depth on your team if you are willing to do this trade. I would try to hold onto Butler, as the Wizards have the most man games of any team after the all-star break. And he is playing out of his mind. Is there someone a notch lower than Butler that you can throw into this package?

2007-02-07 14:50:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Nash and Areanas are more or less the same amount of points for your team every time they play and thats with nash only getting 10 pts and 12 assists. joe johnson makes up for the points that nash doesn't get on the nights he goes for 20 assists and 8 points and butler is an all-around player. if your league is built for scorers, definitely go for it. but if its for all-around i think you're getting jobbed.

2007-02-07 10:23:54 · answer #8 · answered by schwanyfam 1 · 0 1

dont do it. You are losing 3 really good players. Arenas has hit a small slump in that he isn't keeping up those rediculous numbers and nash is just so valuable. Johnson is good in many ways and butler has been playing great

2007-02-07 14:05:09 · answer #9 · answered by Evan L 2 · 0 1

Too lazy to do a precise a hundred, huh? LOL. i might desire to nit-p.c.., yet no 2 human beings are going to agree on a catalogue of the precise 50 gamers. considering that i'm a Warriors fan, I might desire to merchandise to your omission of Stephen Jackson from the precise 50 gamers. 20 pts, 5 rebs, and six asts warrants a precise 50 decision. He even performs protection on a collection that doesn't play protection. yet, super interest otherwise. a hundred/a hundred for attempt 87/a hundred for accuracy

2016-09-28 13:52:58 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers