2007-02-07 09:43:52 · 5 answers · asked by jontrollope 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
He is responsible, it is believed, for the deaths of several hundred healthy women. He had no discernable motive in most cases. This was not a case of a kindly doctor helping a terminally ill patient to end their life with dignity. It follows that he cannot be described as a hero. He is most certainly a villian.
2007-02-07 10:08:33 · answer #1 · answered by skip 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what a strange question, obviously fishing for lots of responses.
okay...I'll plump for villain - possibly Britain's most prolific serial killer. He was convicter of killing a 15 people (a sample case). He killed many more, possibly into the 100s.
Why on earth would he be a hero?
2007-02-07 09:51:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
From what I read a villan.
Killing to just kill old ladies.
How is that a hero for any sane person.
2007-02-07 09:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Villain on balance.
2007-02-07 10:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I take it he never met your gran.
2007-02-07 09:51:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋