English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Last year i ran accrost this company clameing to have invented a device to controle cold fusion they call them Nano Detonators, They did give me a free share and I did perches a share for a small amount .

Ive been on Gods green earth for over 50 years now and remember when the first man went to the moon . I remember the birth of the computer the cell phone and allot of things that most people take for granted today but back in the days if I would have invested a few bucks on these inventions I would be a rich man today but like an *** i would listen to all the people saying ; Well thats nuts they cant do that its imposible;so i figure what the hell I spend more on the imposible LOTTO trying to win .

My question is do you think its possible that this may be a good thing or am i wasteing my time with big hopes and dreams .

They do send me updates and reports on the company .

< http://www.deltore.com/partner.htm >

2007-02-07 09:32:57 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

4 answers

I actually really believe in Cold Fusion.

Cold fusion is an unproven process to fuse two deuterium atoms at room temperatures by passing an electrical current through two electrodes. The importance of this process is that it gives humans the ability to utilize energy. Utilizing energy would have a dynamic impact on society. Cold fusion can be reversed from a fifteen-year-old policy. The Department of Energy has ordered for a re-evaluation. Supporters of cold fusion believe it has the potential of developing a source that can produce pollution-free power. Those who are against this research say it is “the greatest scientific hoax of the twentieth century.”


--------------------------

Using Electrolysis:

Electrolysis is the break down of water to its main components: deuterium and oxygen. This occurs when an electrical current passes through one electrode to another. The current encourages the separation of water, making the hydrogen ions become positively charged leaving their electrons behind, which in turn makes oxygen negatively charged. These ions are then attracted to opposite charges of the electrodes. The overall result of electrolysis of water is hydrogen bubbles at one electrode and oxygen at the other.


---------------------
The theory behind it all

Palladium and Deuterium:

There are so many competing theories of why and how the reactions in cold fusion take place. Two ideas on how cold fusion works involve the way the palladium reacts with deuterium. One idea states that, “the metal in the electrode stores the energy over time, and then splits a neighboring nucleus.”

The internal structure of palladium explains why the concentration within the metal has the ability to be so great. Palladium is made up of a sequence of cubes with atoms at each corner and center of each face. When a deuterium atom enters the metal, it gives up its electron, and shares it equally with the metal. The positively charged atom is free and moves to zones within the metal. Finally, when all zones are occupied it is known as saturated. In a saturated palladium metal, six palladium atoms in a bipyramidal shape, surround it. This process is known as screening and makes the deuterium atom repel less towards other deuterium atoms. This is what gives the deuterium atoms the ability to come so close together and allow quantum tunneling to take place. Quantum tunneling happens when two deuterium atoms interact and bounce off each other repeatedly. After hours of these interactions these atoms have the tendency to fuse together to form a new element.

-------------
Rearranging the Nucleus:

Built on the idea of rearranging the nucleus of the deuterium atoms. Peroni Paolo wrote in Nature, “Another form of radiationless reaction is possible. When two deuterium nuclei meet in a tokamak at high temperature, they have no time to rearrange their internal structures.” Paolo also commented on the long term scales of cold fusion and how most reactions lasted more than 100 hours. He describes how the proton of one nucleus could be repelled by the proton on the other, producing tritium and a free proton.

2007-02-09 10:39:34 · answer #1 · answered by Bleeble Blabble 3 · 0 0

I doubt that it is fusion, at least not fusion in the conventional sense.
Fusion requires pushing two atomic nucei close enough together for the SNF (Strong Nuclear Force) to bind them together into one new nucleus. The problem is that they both have positive electrical charges and the EM (electromagnetic) repulsion works to prevent you from doing that. The SNF has a very limited range (less than that of of the width of an atom) and the EM force has a very long range. So the EM force is repelling them from each other long before they can get close enough for the SNF to overpower the EMF.
In order to get them together, takes very high amounts of energy. In stars it is heat and pressure. The more pressure you have, the less heat is necessary, but even at the core of a star, the temperature necessary is millions of degrees. Without pressure (as is the case in a H-bomb) the temperature is well over a hundred million degrees.
It may be possible that your company has discovered a chemical reaction that can release large amounts of energy at (relatively speaking) cool temperatures, but it is most likely not fusion.
If you want to invest, then by all means go ahead. If the price is right, put a little "mad money" (money you don't mind losing) into it and sit back and see what happens. After all, post-it notes and silly putty were accidental discoveries made while searching for something else.

2007-02-08 00:46:16 · answer #2 · answered by sparc77 7 · 0 0

I enjoyed the diatribe on the sequence of events that brought you to this point.
You seem to be getting by OK.
Nix on the cold fusion though these guys are flogging a dead horse and extra money from you will never bring the critter to life.
Good luck in your endeavors the lotteries. yeuh.

2007-02-08 03:48:25 · answer #3 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 0

real as in???? Are our dreams real? What is 'Real' ???? Is the sword on that game real?? Defining real is very hard but an answer to your question is YES its real, its theoretically possible and they are trying to achieve it every day!! but its kinda proving impossible at the moment but one day im sure we will master it!

2016-05-24 04:17:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers