English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

I think it's a little of Both, but mostly today's society reflects looser morals. It seems that the majority of people today don't care about anybody but themselves and so the mentality is all for me and no matter how they have to get it they will and in their eyes it's all for them so it's all good.

2007-02-09 04:33:08 · answer #1 · answered by sassysisjoy 1 · 0 0

A subculture is neither a mirrored image of it really is morality, nor its morality a mirrored image of it. A society's moral criteria are basically an characteristic of that society. usually, each technology has regarded on the recent technology after it and defined it as having lax morals. yet in reality criteria at the instantaneous are not being degraded a lot as shifted to correspond with the ever replacing values inherent contained in the cultural dynamic. Our morals at the instantaneous are not growing looser yet taking into consideration the fashionable liberal outlook. once higher society concept it grow to be immoral to question church doctrine. as quickly because it grow to be immoral to get a tattoo. we've come to settle for some issues formerly we would not; yet also to not settle for different issues. Slavery is a best get jointly.

2016-12-03 21:00:19 · answer #2 · answered by picart 4 · 0 0

every generation veiws its ancestors with selective memory, and there were a lot less of us in times past.

so if the uk had a population of 1 million, and 3% were criminals, thats 30,000 law breakes

now it has 65 million, so if only 3% are criminals still, than thats 3,150,000 criminals. Plus we have less child mortality, and live longer, so the same criminals do more damage, and for much longer, but the rate of criminals has not risen.

apply this logic to morals and you will get the same results.

2007-02-07 09:39:38 · answer #3 · answered by DAVID C 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers