2007-02-07 07:58:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
lunatic: It is highly unlikely (to the point of being essentially impossible) that everyone interacting with this questioner is experiencing the same illusion simultaneously.
2007-02-07 08:08:00 · answer #1 · answered by computerguy103 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just because something has a valid proof doesn't make it proven. Also quarks may be space empty of matter, but not of energy. So if you insist on making direct connections instead of analogies, this only proves that the PHYSICAL form of life is not real, the energies still are. Or more to your discription, yes the physical is illusion, but the energies aren't, they still have validity, with or without physical form.
2007-02-07 09:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by johnseastep 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A quark is not empty space. A quark is a subatomic particle that occupies space.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS IMMATERIAL MATTER.
Learn to more strictly define the word "illusion," and the context with which it shall be used.
2007-02-07 14:33:04 · answer #3 · answered by Steven James 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it is not an illusion. Actually your life and your illusions would either be or not be together under your theory. That is, if quarks implied that your life is not real, then they would also imply that your illusions are not real. So I think that there is no inference to be made with regards to your life from quark theories.
2007-02-07 08:51:59 · answer #4 · answered by adar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what you think of as "real" or "illusion". Is empty space not real? Even if you are just made up of empty space, or according to other theories, if you're a series of particles vibrating at a certain frequency- why would that make you any less real?
2007-02-07 08:08:01 · answer #5 · answered by Boberella 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually quarks do have theoretical mass and are therefore not empty space. (You should at least check wikipedia before making a statement.)
2007-02-07 08:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by silondan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if you wish it to be. Empty space is not all that we are, but I'm sure that if you want to prove something, you can find some research somewhere that you can point to in order to say that you are right about something.
2007-02-07 08:01:30 · answer #7 · answered by Hoolia 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's the point of quarks if they do not synergistically comprise something that reflects upon them?
2007-02-07 08:05:56 · answer #8 · answered by starryeyed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Illusion which feels so tangible...What a creation...Illusion which let us experience joy , sorrow, love, hate, anything, name it...while being in form....
2007-02-07 08:19:30 · answer #9 · answered by Oleg B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-02-07 08:06:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋