For those declaring that they support the wars because we have not been attacked since it started, you need to educate yourselves.
First of all, before the war, there was no way in hell that Iraq was a threat to us, or any country. Now, terrorists are so uncontained running wild everywhere, and preoccupied with sectarian violence, that they don't want to even bother planning an attack on America. That should tell you right there that leaving Iraq would not be a bad strategy.
Secondly, stop bragging about the war. The truth is that no terrorists have ever even planned on attacking our homeland again, and that is the reason we have not been attacked yet.
Lastly, if we pulled out of Iraq and by some impossible task the terrorists were able to regroup enough to plan an attack on the USA, don't you think our Intelligence could protect us? Or do repubs think the Bush Administration is too incompetent to protect us? Aren't dems the ones who call the Bush Administration incompetent?
2007-02-07 07:54:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
My question, essentially, is to ask this: Why do some people say they support the wars because we have not been attacked since it started, without realizing that no one has tried to attack us? Are they just ignorant or not using common sense?
2007-02-07 08:00:43 · update #1
3rd Answerer...how am I the ignorant one? Everything I said is true. You are ignorant if you don't agree. You have NO evidence that anyone has tried to attack us again, and neither does anyone else. Because it has not happened.
It is really easy to call me ignorant in retalliation, but can you back up your pathetic response? NO YOU CAN'T! SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP OR GET OFF Y!A POLITICS, OK?
2007-02-07 08:05:52 · update #2
Mark j, why are you giving me links about terrorists arrested within our country? You missed my whole point. I am referring to terrorists within Iraq and Afghanistan, got it? I can tell you tried so hard, but you only made a fool of yourself and didn't disprove my point.
2007-02-07 08:21:12 · update #3
BTW, if our president worked to weed out illegal immigration, don't you think that would not be so much an issue?
2007-02-07 08:21:45 · update #4
What is your question?
2007-02-07 07:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the Government would do a even halfway decent job of noticing and checking people who come to this Country there would be no terrorists to worry about. George Bush is not doing anything to stop the illegals from Mexico. How do we know the terrorists are not gaining entry the same way.
2007-02-07 16:00:36 · answer #2 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2002/10/05/MN62840.DTL
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13491653/
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/08/25/ap/world/mainD8JNH8IG3.shtml
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2006/06/03/terror-suspects.html
How's this for information and proof? If you want more, I'll be more than happy to provide you with info. Maybe it's time you stepped out of fairly tail land and realized that terrorism is not a conspiracy thought up by the government and is very much a threat to this country.
2007-02-07 16:13:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
honestly, the only way for them to validate the war is to day we havent been attacked yet, so bush is good. they have nothing else to claim bush is doing a good job. its the last little thing they have left to hold on to.
2007-02-07 16:04:26 · answer #4 · answered by 2010 CWS Champs! 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are the ignorant one
2007-02-07 16:03:06 · answer #5 · answered by xquis81 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You think it's a coincidence we haven't been hit again?
2007-02-07 16:05:24 · answer #6 · answered by Hella 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋