I don't think he's Satan or anything, and I see there's a much bigger picute, and lots more people are accountable as much as he is.
Why doesn't everybody want him to be locked up?
2007-02-07 07:51:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Please don't ask for examples, just open your eyes and you'll see that almost every single thing he does either harms the US or the rest of the world in some way or other. He creates so many divisions amongst the US (and burns bridges along the line) and abroad and bullies other countries with his ruthless and thoughtless views of foriegn policy.
2007-02-07 08:01:52 · update #1
Hawk, you don't know what you're talking about. At least I'm not ignorant enough to call names and spout out insults to legitimate questions, and people whom I have no clue about (I know ~ALOT~ about Bush).
2007-02-07 08:23:08 · update #2
That 30 some percent who still are on his side(according to polls) just must not like to be wrong so they feel they must continue to support him.
This President did what Congress gave him the power to do, take this country to war without any ones consent. They relinquished their own power & nullified that part of the Constitution that says that only Congress can give consent for a President to take this country to war. So, yes, perhaps a lot of them should be locked up also. However, not even Washington obtained permission from Congress to start the Revolutionary War, he asked for it after he had started it! No President has ever really asked Congress for permission but most have asked for it after the war had started. The War in Iraq is not a declared war, it is like Korea, guess we will have to start calling it Police Action as Korea was called.
2007-02-07 08:07:28 · answer #1 · answered by geegee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You know...there are always groups who are unhappy with the president. It doesn't matter which party, how much good he's done...if he didn't do what you think he should do...then he's a bad president.
Overall, most politicians are liars...yet we expect the top politician to change once he gets to president...suddenly he's supposed to be honest. All of the policticians in the house and senate have personal, private and public agendas. More time is spent on fooling the voters so they can get their personal stuff pushed through.
I like Bush. I think it's time we pulled out of Iraq...as most American's do. But I think that getting Sadaam out of power was a good thing. That man was vile and one of Satan's own!!
2007-02-07 08:07:31 · answer #2 · answered by Misty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can support Bush because he has not been greedy or foolish or destructive.
He has not been as competent as he should have been with the war and securing the border.
Fact is, he hasn't done anything illegal as the dishonest liberals keep saying, he didn't steal the elections like the dishonest democrats tried to do. And he isn't deliberately trying to sabotage the effort in Iraq like the lying liberals in D.C. are, just to make Bush fail.
Face it, the libs have been more hateful and dishonest about Bush than ever in our history.
2007-02-07 08:35:28 · answer #3 · answered by RockHunter 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
(I see there's a much bigger picture)
Then you must know if we leave iraq will be taken over by a fundementalist/anarchy governemnt type, lets call it fundarchy for fun.
(lots more people are accountable as much as he is)
I hope so, that just means there were many minds at work here trying to make the right decisions accordingly, you should be worried if only bush were accountable, then this would be a dictatorship.
(Locked up?)
For trying to protect america? Is that not the number one priority of the U.S. government; security?
2007-02-07 08:03:56 · answer #4 · answered by shadycaliber 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The latest greedy thing is buying land in Uruguay. He can now retire to a pristine area and leave the rest of us to live with his environmental policies that are ruining this Country.
2007-02-07 08:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You responded your individual question. the two events are totally attentive to the dangers. i think of what you're relatively asking, is ought to a guy be held in charge for a newborn if he needs the girl to have an abortion and she or he refuses. the respond is confident, sorry that became the prospect you took once you had intercourse.
2016-12-17 11:36:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't see any of the things he has done as foolish or destructive. It's a problem of perception.
It seems Bush could do anything and get a free pass with some folks.
2007-02-07 07:59:31 · answer #7 · answered by Murphy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You make a very good point. If I were to see greedy foolish destructive things that Bush was responsible for, I wouldn't support him. I haven't seen any.
2007-02-07 07:59:47 · answer #8 · answered by Rob D 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
You'll find that in politics and religion, in the face of insurmountable evidence, some people will never change their beliefs. EVER.
2007-02-07 07:54:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
And Clinton was being constructive when he shot a load on lewinsky's blue dress
2007-02-07 07:54:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋