Hey- you say Bush isn't a murderer because he didn't personally kill anybody but neither did Saddam.
2007-02-07 07:26:17 · 7 answers · asked by Danibel 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Get real.
2007-02-07 07:30:06 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam Hussein is way worse he killed 2 million human beings led to genocide adversarial to the Kurdes and Marsh Arabs he began a conflict with Iran and killed a million million human beings their utilising poison gas and bombs he hangs human beings and images human beings he invaded Kuwait and the WMD were poison gas and they did discover them! Bush isn't an same definite he's a homophobe and a plutocrate yet he purely had human beings killed in a conflict adversarial to a evil guy and his get collectively! i did not vote for bush and that i'm a democrate not a leftist fool! like the I hate united statesa. crowd.
2016-11-26 00:15:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is good. Saddam was bad. There is no comparison.
2007-02-07 07:35:38 · answer #3 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
My understanding is that Saddam did personally kill many people and his evil sons would rape and torture people before killing them.
2007-02-07 07:31:14 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How is it possible to compare a ruthless dictator to a democratically elected President? Your statement is ridiculous and irresponsible.
2007-02-07 07:59:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the next step is to send iraqis to guantannamo bay or auschwitz...
2007-02-07 07:50:19 · answer #6 · answered by lubomirbotev 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shhhh, they can hear you!
2007-02-07 07:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Monkey Boy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋