I know it isn't. But just suppose for a moment that that one act was what it would take to end terrorism.
Would you support it?
Again - I KNOW IT ISN'T. So telling me that it isn't is redundant.
2007-02-07 06:53:29 · 9 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ruth: Actually, it isn't a ridiculous question. It's designed to determine whether you want what's right, or just want to blindly support the President, who doesn't want to leave Iraq under any circumstances.
So instead of declaring yourself a judge over people's questions, why not open your mind to the fact that there might be a reason I asked what I did?
2007-02-07 07:01:05 · update #1
Hey, "leftsmack" - it's Che Guevara, not Chi.
Nice try.
As to the rest of your response... well... *yawn*
2007-02-07 07:11:32 · update #2
It could be actually, because certainly staying in Iraq is not the answer either.
2007-02-07 06:56:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I would absolutely support it. I live in a Muslim country and I know that there is a lot of resentment about the US and the UK being in Iraq and any other part of the Middle East, for that matter. I think it would calm down the radical Muslims if this were to actually happen.
2007-02-07 14:59:06 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ terry g ♥ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we are going to play in la la land, why not add some fairy magic and chocolate?
If it would stop terrorism, of course we would leave. Since it won't this question is ridiculous.
I am getting tired of chi guy discrediting all conservatives with Bush. Get some new material.
EDIT: Answering your question with my opinion shouldn't require that you feel the need to call me out. But I would make a great "Question Judge," actually. You are hereby held in contempt.
2007-02-07 14:57:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
What if monkeys flew out of my butt ?
I know what you're getting at , but it doesn't fit so you must acquit .
Felt dirty to quote an imbecile like Johnny Cochran .
I would support it . That felt almost as dirty and wrong as quoting OJ'S attorney .
2007-02-07 15:03:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If Bush, Hannity, Coulter, and Limbaugh said otherwise, that is all the neos would hear. What is good and what is Bush's direction does not coincide. Therefore, neos will never abandon their god-like figure head and his three angels.
2007-02-07 14:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I'm with ruth on this one - lol. I'd support the withdrawal!
2007-02-07 15:00:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If it was the solution, then I would support that course of action. It isn't, and it's good that you know that it isn't.
2007-02-07 14:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If elephants flew, would we call them birds? Yes in both cases.
2007-02-07 15:41:52 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Then, of course, it would be done.
2007-02-07 14:58:52 · answer #9 · answered by Rob D 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋