Can't do it, they are all equally capable of gross stupidity, blood thirsty genocide and appalling women's rights.
2007-02-07 07:04:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rotifer 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
East Asians
Whites
Native Americans
Central Asians
Blacks
2007-02-07 14:37:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
African
Central Asians (paki, hindu, persian, arab)
East Asian
American indegenous
European
Im taking into account all of history and not just the last 500 years.
2007-02-07 14:49:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by $0.02 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Everyone is going to choose their own society as the most intelligent and the society they know least about as the least intelligent. So not really a fair question and it encourages racism
2007-02-07 15:46:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by susan h 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
These are not societies, neither are they cultures. They are a bigoted grouping of people based on appearance. You could just as well group them as tall people, short people, red haired people, blonde people, blue eyed people and brown eyed people. It would be equally meaningless.
You could try reading about other societies around the world, widening you understanding of the human race (not races). You never know, you might lose your racist attitudes along the way. At least you would be a better educated racist.
2007-02-07 14:54:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by tentofield 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
all equal depends upon the individual not the society
2007-02-07 14:39:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Marvin R 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
one can list people by perceived intelligence, but it's rather disingenous, in my opninion, to try to characterize ethic categories as such.
2007-02-07 14:38:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
All have their idiots, all have their geniuses.
2007-02-07 18:48:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Indigo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I refuse to do so.
2007-02-08 00:36:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋