Because intelligent people have maintained that GWB stole both elections, does that make it untrue?

Question

I know conservatives are tired of hearing it, but it's the truth.

Answer 1

I can relate. George Bush President of the United States is a man who has flushed all honor and integrity down the toilet. He has spread shame on America, it's Constitution, and it's People. It is a highly embarrassing situation for every Good American. This Man has spun completely out of control and he needs to be stopped immediately. President Bush has discounted himself to nothing more then a mere "War Criminal."

Answer 2

Ok, just tell me one thing....how do you go about "stealing" an election? Did President Bush fly around on a magic carpet on election night stuffing the ballot boxes? Come on, they way the Dems hovered around all the election places, how did anything get by them?
And something else...the Dems/Libs say President Bush is so stupid, how do they feel now that the stupid GWB pulled the wool over their eyes?
He didn't steal the elections, the Dems just can't handle that the majority of the American public chose President Bush over their candidate.

Answer 3

Yep, we're sick of it, and just because you say it's the truth doesn't make it so.

Believe whatever you want, it's a free country. I would recommend finding a way to get past your hatred. It's not healthy.

A study by the nonpartisan American Center for Voting Rights (ACVR), released on August 2, 2005, finds that the Democrats committed significant election fraud in an attempt to steal the 2004 presidential election, while falsely accusing the Republicans of election fraud. According to the study, the Democrats actually succeeded in stealing the presidential election in one state, effectively stealing that state's votes in the Electoral College.

The ACVR study and its supporting documentation is available online at:

Answer 4

No. He gained simply by electoral college. The electoral college grew to become into put in place to end precisely what could have got here approximately interior the 2000 election. If we as a rustic went by common vote, then the events could in basic terms might desire to pay interest on the inhabitants centers and that they might overlook related to something of the rustic. Our founding fathers in no way needed this united states of america to degrade all the way down to a interior of reach president. They had to make it to the place all states had to be known. If the election focused on numbers, why might desire to any candidate care what South Carolina, Nevada, New Mexico, Haiwi, or Alaska thinks. So by not specializing in triumphing states quite of focusing on numbers, the democrats lost.

Answer 5

Where is the proof. I want real proof not just what some liberal run newspaper or TV station considers facts. Then we can talk until then I think Blues Clues is on you may wan to watch it & get a CLUE!

Answer 6

Actually, it is not true. It is only the unintelligent people who know nothing about elections, politics, and the Constitution that believe Bush stole either one of the elections.

Answer 7

If we are so good at stealing elections, then why did them dems get majority in november?

Answer 8

In this case it means all the fools agree. Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Hate, vitriol, politics, partisanship and hyperbole do.

Answer 9

If you claim or even think that Bush "stole" either election, having intelligence is not something you should claim to have.

Answer 10

It's like stealing an election from a baby...

Well at least the baby part is true.