For file names, which is better, the underscore or the dash? For docs? For htm files?

Answer 1

Since you mention htm files, I assume you want to know for the web (or something similar that doesn't allow spaces). Either works just as well. It's a matter of persional preference. Underscores look more like spaces, and with dashes you don't have to hit Shift first. I'd suggest just trying both and seeing which you like better. I tend to use underscores more myself, but I use dashes on occasion as well.

Answer 2

I prefer spaces. If not spaces, I prefer dashes. The reason is that, if you underline an underscored file name, you can't see the underscore.

Answer 3

I would prefer dash rather than underscore because, undescores are just irritating to look at some times....
I_hate_underscore_very_much
I-like-dash-very-much
Actually both are as equally irritating to look at....

Answer 4

I think that both are acceptable, but I personally prefer the underscore

Answer 5

I prefer the underscore, but either is perfectly fine.

Answer 6

How about a space? You can use spaces for file names. What looks more attractive?

St2098Trn_Rec.doc

or

Store 2098 - Training Records.doc?

Since Windows 95 we have been blessed with long file names. Take advantage of them!

Answer 7

the underscore

Answer 8

both are fine, but the underscore is easier to read.

Answer 9

some operating platforms do not note of the area personality something like DOS record names being interior the 8.3 format. and obviously, clarity and luxurious is likewise a element.

Answer 10

underscore always!!