People on acid maybe more prone to suggestion, but I think the results would be erratic and impossible to control. Since individuals handle the drug differently, and cult leaders usually desire a uniform group action, using acid to exert control over people would probably be a bad idea. For every person you're able to effectively influence, you'd have 5 more just running around the room and painting stuff on walls. Besides, people can be brainwashed easily enough without drugs.
2007-02-07 05:30:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by kittykorruption 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Acid does make people do things they would not do normally, but you cannot control what they will do. This is one of the major problems with using acid. LSD in the unrefined state unintentionally got into the food supply at several times in Western History. Sometimes people thought that acid victims had demons or were being controlled by Satan. These people were very hard or impossible to restrain. The only thing that could be done for them was to restrain them until it passed out of their systems. Brainwashing people who are on acid would not be possible. And I am even talking about doses that are very small. Brainwashing before the acid is taken though...
2007-02-07 13:48:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Susas 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No- people probably won't pay much attention to a cult leader if they were tripping. They'd be looking at the walls waving or looking at how weird people look. They'd laugh or freak out if someone told them to do something they weren't keen on. Plus, a large cult wouldn't all act as a unit because people act different on it, so would be having a quiet trip, some a fun trip, some a bad trip, etc.
2007-02-07 13:33:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by live75 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Acid was devoloped by the US & British governments and tested on soldiers during WW2 and the troops that were under the influence of LSD had some amazing kill stats. I can't find the book I had about this right not but if I come across it I will edit and update this post.
2007-02-07 13:29:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Strange reminds me of the serial killer
Damer. He tried to put real acid in his victims heads. And as for Manson his "family" was often times on drugs. But he and Jim Jones worked mostly on their charisma.
Great question, freaky but good one!
2007-02-07 13:32:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hollygood 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Biologically a tissue can either be hurt or be stimulated to feel pleasure!!
BUT NEVER YOUR BRAIN TISSUES CAN BE CONTROLLED BY SOME EXTERNAL FORCES!!
You can give a child either a sweet chocolate or a bitter one. That does not mean, that you can make the child genius one or stupid by giving so!!
CONTROLLING ONE'S MIND, IS IN FACT A VERY BIG PHENOMENON, THAT CAN NOT BE DONE BY ANY TYPE OF ACID!! AFTER ALL ACID HAS NO THINKING OR DIRECTING ABILITY!!
Only, our parentel/ leadership concepts and bias on RELIGION, LANGUAGE AND CULTURE HAVE SOME LONG LASTING EFFECT ON HUMAN BRAIN LIKE "BRAIN-WASHING". IT IS MORE LIKE, CONCEPTUAL ONE! THAT IS
"YOURS- ARE- INFERIOR- AND MINE- IS- SUPERIOR" CONCEPTUAL-BRAIN WASH"!!
Other than that, a strong mind can never be brain-washed by any type of chemicals!! At the most, chemicals and acids do have some sedative effects which induce a kind of inertness or numbness in thinking!! Like one who had consumed opium and be in inactive state!!
KINDLY MIND IT!
THOUGHT IS INVISIBLE!
AND CHEMICALS ARE VISIBLE AND TANGIBLE!! AND HOW COME THE MIND-LESS TANGIBLE CHEMICALS DO EDUCATE, CONTROL AND "GIVE LOT OF THINKING" TO OUR BRAIN FOR GOOD OR BAD?
For example! Injecting the said chemicals in to one's brain, is it possible to make Him genius like Einstein and Bill gates?
NO! CHEMICALS NEVER CARRY ANY WISDOM AS A CARRIER FOR ANY ONE!
IT DESTROYS THE CELLS OR ELSE REJUVANATES, AND NEVER EVER GIVING SUGGESTIONS LIKE A "PROGRAMMED DIGITAL CHIP"!!
2007-02-07 14:47:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by yozenbalki 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Remember a guy named Manson?
I don't recommend you try it.
2007-02-07 13:33:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jed 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it affects people in different ways and it is temporary
2007-02-07 13:28:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by s2or3 2
·
0⤊
0⤋