Easier said then done.
Yet again more talk and no action.
2007-02-07 05:01:23 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Of course she won't. She'll keep saying how important it is to pull them out NOW, right up until election, then blame Bush after the election, because she can't just bring them home.
2007-02-07 05:06:14 · answer #1 · answered by zebj25 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This woman has already been bought and sold. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-02-07 05:07:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Non sequitur. She has no intention of pulling out the troops so long as it weakens the Arabs and strengthens Israel. Whatever made you think the Democrats are any different from the Republicans when it comes to the Middle East?
2007-02-07 05:07:59 · answer #3 · answered by Nasrin S 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She probable ought to have fought on - in spite of each thing the inventive conflict grow to be very diverse from the different conflict that we've fought. We were combating for our dream: a loose and independant u . s . a .. regardless of the reality that i do not for my area like her, I agree that she has the administration traits to have considered us by skill of a revolution. I have self assurance that shall we've gained the inventive conflict with invoice Clinton, Jack Kennedy, Woodrow Wilson, Howard Taft or a lot of our different presidents.
2016-12-03 20:44:01 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it would be alot easier to opine on the subject if Hillary would tell us where she stands......it seems alot of "fluff" and no "substance" to me, i mean, i voted for the war, the war is a mistake, we need out, i'll get us out, i can do this or that, yet when asked for a plan or even an outline of an original idea, we get more "fluff"....this is nothing more than power politics using what appears to her as the weakest republican point to try to get elected.....& if she is....elected....fluff will not fix anything....I want to hear real answers to hard questions, not this "say just enuff to make everyone think i am agreeing with them."
2007-02-07 05:10:25 · answer #5 · answered by rjsluvbug 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's not going to bring them back right away because that would be wrong. After all the damage that has been done it would be morally wrongful to abandon the iraqis in the state they are in. Hopefully after Bush's "surge" the situation will be better off and then we can start bringing our boyr back. If hilary is lucky to have this be the case when she gets into office she'll be able to bring'em back right away. if not she'll have to wait.
2007-02-07 05:09:04 · answer #6 · answered by leidy101 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she wins president? Are your elections some kind of competition? Do the 'winners' get a medal? What else can they win? Are there cash prizes?
I suppose you are a red neck and that is why you support this ridiculous inhuman war and Bush and that is why you have such a pathetic command of the English language.
2007-02-07 05:07:28 · answer #7 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
she won't due to the fact she will not win and if she did she wouldn't do it even then because those terrorist that we are keeping at bay over in the middle east will find their way here if we were to pull out and i firmly believe that it will just show them the US is weak and the leader will be the cause of it do we want that to happen no because alot of people will be killed think about it.
2007-02-07 05:42:59 · answer #8 · answered by Denny O 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL! No action? She hasn't won the nomination, she hasn't been elected (not that that stopped Bush) she has not been sworn in, yet you want her to start acting NOW? This is so ridiculous, I don't even know how to answer this 'question'.
2007-02-07 05:09:06 · answer #9 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If anything she'll just pull everyone out, and abandon the Iraqi people to whomever happens to take over as soon as we're gone.
2007-02-07 05:05:47 · answer #10 · answered by yeraluzer 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋