I have wondered about this for 5 years.
So the world is controled by banks and aristrocrats not votes. Everyone knows this.
Bin Laden claimed he bombed the WTC because the US had bombed his family Banks in Bierut.
Isn't this simply one aristrocrat bombing another. Like Bush bombing Saddam.
Does any of this have any meaning that applies to the general public. It's like the Kings of France and England fighting for 100's of years. One aristrocrat fighting another.
2007-02-07 04:50:08 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Unfortunately, some aristocrats in our nation have always excused themselves for acting like the old monarchs of europe - they call it realpolitik, but it is really stealing our assets, our blood and muscle, and our good name for their ends.
The connections between Bin Ladens and Bushes are very strange, and I think there is far more to this than meets the eye. Bush's grandfather was sanctioned for trading with the enemy, when he was banking for the Third Reich. Bush 41 gave missiles to the Iranians holding our hostages. Bush 43 gave the Taliban 43 million dollars shortly after they blew up the Buddhist statutes and he called off all U.S. programs targeting bin laden....
2007-02-07 05:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by cassandra 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most people don't seem to understand GW Bush is a puppet being controlled by very powerful and wealthy men who would have our countries military do their financial bidding!
This is all about the US control over the economy of the Middle East as a whole!
Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are fighting this control! I do not believe in this ideology of the Middle Eastern radicals but I understand the fact that they want to control their own futures and don't want to become like the Western countries!
They don't like our culture and to be honest I don't think they will ever become Westernized completely!
By attacking America Osama didn't realize that it gave Bush the excuse he was looking for to invade the Middle East. By invading Iraq the US knew that Iran would respond! Now it's just insurgents. When will it be completely all out war against the US?
The bigger question in my mind is what about Russia and China?
We know they are suppling Iran and other countries in the Middle East with war munitions and yet we still sit at the table with them economically?
When will they join forces and fight against us?
2007-02-07 13:06:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Bin Laden are very good friends; in fact they are probably supping cocktails around Bush's pool on his ranch right now and joking about all the cash they are raking in from the murder and misery of others.
Anyway, what you are saying is nonsense because if you believe the main stream media you would know that Laden has been disowned by his family and gets no money from the banks anymore. Why would he need it with all the dosh Bush is throwing around?
2007-02-07 13:03:51 · answer #3 · answered by airmonkey1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHAT THA ?????
Unanswerable. The very premise of your question is founded in a lie, that Bush attacked Iraq for family reasons.
If you sincerely require an answer to your question, you have extensively deep-rooted psychological issues, and basic problem solving skills, that none of us are properly trained to assist you with.
More "Moral Equivalency" from the far leftist psycophants.
I would love to watch you explain your simplistic, childish ideology to a member of the Mujahadeen, Al Qaeda or Hamas, as they put a black hood over your head and sharpen their machete. People like you are fools who will get more Americans killed on American soil.
....Let me attempt to make sense of your drivel like this: ..."If it is okay for you to ask such an asinine and moronic question, - why, then, wouldn't it be okay to offer you up for Islamic extremists to have their way with ???"
I've thought about THAT for 5 years.
Twit.
2007-02-07 13:09:24 · answer #4 · answered by leftsmack 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So Bush is such a mastermind that he was able to get the UN to approve 13(?) resolutions against Hussein, some even before he was president, and get both the Democrats and Republicans in Congress to vote to give him authority to invade Iraq yet he is such a bumbling fool that he couldn't even successfully plant some WMDs to make the invasion appear legitimate.
Use some critical thought when asking these questions please. Your premise is faulty.
2007-02-07 12:56:43 · answer #5 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
bush has US as his way to gain power, so he thinks he has power too to make same things become different things. it is just not fair.
2007-02-07 12:56:46 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is the US double Standards my dear!
2007-02-07 12:57:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋