This woman has already been bought and sold. Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the experience, in the military or intelligence sectors of our government to be effective in a time when we are fighting a war oversees and conducting a broader “war” on terrorism. Normally, this would not be an impediment...there have been many good Presidents, with no serious military credentials –– her husband being one of them. However, in order to rectify the quagmire that Bush has got us in, and also to redirect the “War on Terrorism” more effectively, and away from this Cowboy/Rambo strategy employed by Bush and his Henchmen, requires someone of either military or strategic competence. Hillary might be good at making chocolate chip cookies... but right now we need someone who demonstrates mastery of both military tactics and foreign diplomacy.
2007-02-07 04:13:55 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
she would cause this "quagmire" to become a full blown world war. there's no way she would keep our troops in Iraq or elsewhere for that matter. and that would cause civil war in the region, forcing Iran to take a role. it would just snowball from there, with Syria, Turkey, Israel...so on and so on getting involved. we will be right back in the thick of things. soooo... pulling out is not an option. not to mention (no offense to the ladies) hillary is a woman.. the muslim world will look down upon us even more than they do now. it would encourage and provoke them. and she wouldn't do a thing about it until it was too late. what we need is someone with a) common sense, b) knowledge of history (as simple as it sounds), and c) fortitude. sorry my friend, but diplomacy will not work with the people were dealing with. these people do not care what we believe in. they are intolerant of it. they really do want the western culture to be buried. that's the truth.
2007-02-07 04:28:59 · answer #1 · answered by jasonsluck13 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is a waste of time. She can't bring in the moderates that the Dems need to win. Obama like Hillary doesn't have experience and they will get pasted on that. Edwards has a likable personality, but he had his shot on a ticket and lost so he's out. Kerry actually did the right thing by bowing out.
On the Republican side, Rudy will have problems with the far right. MC Cain's time is done.
There will likely be a couple of sleepers on both sides that will unexpectedly show up and that's where the race will begin.
2007-02-07 12:47:09 · answer #2 · answered by chefantwon 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't know, her first presidency didn't go that badly.
Besides, ANYTHING is better than someone who was AWOL for most of this "Vietnam Service". If you thing The Shrub isn't "Bought and Sold" you're sadly deluded.
Anyone who gives the situation an honest appraisal knows she doesn't stand a snowball's chance in hell of being elected.
What Conservative Pundits don't realize is that she's a sacraficial lamb. They'll spend all their time and energy attacking her, which will make the REAL Democratic candidate look like a golden boy.
The fact that you're spending your time ranting and raving about Hillary is just proof of how well that strategy is working.
If you sincerely want to see a Republican in the White House in 2008, then you need to look past the paper targets of Obama and Hillary to see who the Democrats are REALLY going to run for the Presidency.
Wasting time attacking Obama and Hillary just plays into the Democratic strategy for 2008.
2007-02-07 12:23:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Although I agree with some of the things you say, I do not agree with others (like the anti-bush slanders that you just HAD to throw into a question that has nothing to do with him).
American needs Hillary like a hole in the head. She is not qualified enough to lead this nation. Actually, if you take a close look at BOTH of the Democratic front-runners (Clinton and Obama) neither one of them have a very strong or lengthy political background... Think of running for the president like applying for a job. If you are applying for a job and you have 6 months experience, you are a less qualified candidate than someone that has been in the field for 10 years. Neither Clinton nor Obama have experience in this... they are both bad choices in my opinion.
2007-02-07 12:21:07 · answer #4 · answered by dreamoutloud2 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Let's look at some other options:
McCain: Bush's yes man, would continue the same path we have been going down
Gulliani: Married his cousin, supported gun control, marched in a gay pride parade, kicked his family out of the Mayor's Mansion so his third wife could move in
Edwards: Already said he will raise taxes....done
2007-02-07 12:23:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
They liked her the first time!
2007-02-07 12:17:37 · answer #6 · answered by this_takes_awhile 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wesley Clark seems nice if that's what you are looking for.
2007-02-07 12:22:06 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
no hillary needs to move to venusuela with her buddy Hugo
2007-02-07 12:18:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋