Would terrorists even respect Hillary Clinton as President?

Question

A majority of terrorists don't respect women. Wouldn't they laugh at a nation run by a woman?

Answer 1

Are you serious, they are some of the one's that is supporting her campaign. They want her in office, this way, she will help them turn America into a communist country. This is probably where most of her campaign funds are coming from, afterall, her husband pardoned terrorist before he left office.

Answer 2

Terrorists respect one thing and that is their own twisted belief system. The ONLY other reason that they have ever paused to think twice is if they are directly confronted with an overpowering or unknown force. It is nature that those who live by force relate best to force being used against them. That limits options when other nations have to deal with them.
Their treatment of women as no better than furniture is well known and documented. It is also well known that many democrats have a very low threshold for making war. Democrats have never really understood how to utilize the military very well (ie: Jimmy Carter's sorry military strategies). The military just does not fit well within the liberal phlosophy; not to fault liberals necessarilly, either, but oil just does not mix well with water. Simply put, It is the "nature of the beast".
To have a democrat in power with the very real future potential for terrorist acts escalating in our nation, would be enough of a wild card. But, to have a FEMALE democrat leading could be the "double whammy" that could sink our boat.
It is true that Mr. Bush has left so much to be desired when it comes to brilliance and efficiency in military tactics. However, I believe that it is because he is a man, and an unpredictable man, that has kept certain terrorists from attacking us since 9/11. They never really know just how "unglued" Bush might become in such a case.

Answer 3

There are many nations that will laugh at the US because of Hillary. If she was elected, the US of A would suffer as a leader in the world. Many nations feel women are better in the number 2 & 3 spot. Not number 1.

Answer 4

I think terrorists would have as much respect for Hillary as Ted Kennedy had for Mary Jo Kopechne.

Answer 5

NO....you need to research their society.....middle eastern women are subservient to their men, women do not belong in places of authority as far as they are concerned.

The terrorist would see us as weak with a woman in power....but they may try anyway....they will certainly try should another party take control of our white house....Just to see how much we will allow them to get by with.....The Republicans have already proven that we have the balls to come after them, and that the democrats will just let them go....as bill and hillary clinton did when he was offered bin laden......because another country had him, and he had already claimed responsibility for the US Embassy bombings.....had clinton put his pecker back in his pants he may have done a little better in office.....doubt it though. but had he taken bin laden instead of letting him go....9-11 would not have happened, and the USS COLE would have not had a hole blown in the side of it and soldiers killed......so the clintons have the blood of over 3,000 men women and children on his hands......and you liberals will never see that.

Answer 6

Who cares? Like I give a flying f*ck what the enemies of this country think about our President. At this point, I have no intention of voting for a woman (being that Clinton is the only one so far), but I would not let their distaste or disrespect for women influence who I vote for to lead our country.

Answer 7

Terrorists, would do well to respect Hillary Clinton. RESPECT is the terrorists only defense, any terrorist that comes out openly will be squashed regardless of who is President.

If terrorists, believe that I will not cut their throats once I know that they are terrorists if Hillary Clinton is President, let them try.

Answer 8

It wouldn't matter who the President was. The president could be a Muslim, and they would still attack us.

Radical Muslims are trying to bring about the apocolypse (along with radical Christians) to bring the Messiah forth. So, who makes the most convenient target? The guy with the most money and the most weapons. We could concievably wipe them off the face of the Earth if we wanted. But that's what they want...to be destroyed so they can have their paradise.

Of course, we make a convenient target for all of the world's troubles...we even get blamed for no-no's that France commits.

Answer 9

When terrorists attacked on 9/11 was there any respect for the man in office? Terrorists are bigots, not unlike you.

Answer 10

Do terrorists respect Bush?

Answer 11

Obama's conflict antagonistic to Libya illustrates the form between the so-pronounced as "Bush Doctrine" and our cutting-edge President's rules. Bush wanting to strike proactively antagonistic to countries and leaders which threaten u . s . a .. He had already neutralized Qaddafi contained in the conflict on Terror. Obama's mind-set is to promote instability in huge swaths of the middle East -- which incorporates Egypt and Libya -- the position the leaders were not threatening the U.S. and (contained with reference to Egypt) were participating contained in the conflict on Terror. Stolen Libyan heavy guns and warm temperature searching for missiles have got here upon their way into the fingers of Al Qaeda. Obama's motives proceed to be unclear. .