that is a big NO
2007-02-07 03:43:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by sydb1967 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
I'm pretty sure if you asked all of the American soldiers who have died in Iraq, they would probably say that Bush did NOT save anyone by invading.
2007-02-07 03:44:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Weston 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
South Americans, maybe. Now their oil is worth more. A nice little side benefit for them is Chavez's stock goes up every time Bush takes him on.
2007-02-07 03:42:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not at all but he is sure making Halburton and Cheney rich. I bet there is a small stipend available to him if the near future.
2007-02-07 03:49:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kenneth H 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO: He was in position to do something that could save America if America was threaten. The perceived threat, turned out to be only HOT AIR.
2007-02-07 03:43:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by whatevit 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Probably in the long run. However, the benefits Bush has accrued for our future are about to be squandered by a Democratic Congress.
2007-02-07 03:44:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by plezurgui 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
Oh, of course. We're fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here...though I do wonder how they would all get here. Iraqis can't even govern their own country, let alone launch a war on United States soil.
2007-02-07 03:46:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
no he killed 3,900 more and counting god bless our troops they should be brought back home , then they should stick a cap up bush's a s s
2007-02-07 03:42:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by THE EVIL TROLL 1
·
5⤊
1⤋
3000+ Soldiers and myself would definitely say NO.
RJ
2007-02-07 03:42:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
No, he has put us on the edge of destruction.
2007-02-07 03:45:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
to some extent
2007-02-07 03:45:42
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ganswers 2
·
0⤊
2⤋