English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I hear this talk about how Kerry was the better candidate or the worse candidate, that Kerry would have ruined the world if he was in office, or that he would have turned this country around 180 degrees. But the point is nobody knows that, probably not even Kerry. Wouldn't it make more sense to say "I think Kerry would have done better" or "I think Kerry was the worst of two evils"?

2007-02-07 03:22:52 · 9 answers · asked by Huey Freeman 5 in Politics & Government Elections

9 answers

You're absolutely correct and it would make more sense. Not many of us are psychic and could know the outcome. For instance, who could have dreamed what a mess George Bush would get us into? Not many or he wouldn't be there.

2007-02-13 06:43:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

One thing's a good bet. If Americans voted again today, Kerry would be determined the lesser of two evils.

2007-02-13 13:10:47 · answer #2 · answered by Scott K 7 · 0 0

John Kerry is no better or worse than any of the other ones. He just got caught in his lie. He was unfit for command then and still is.

2007-02-13 21:28:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I couldn't imagine how Kerry would have handled another September 11.

2007-02-12 07:23:32 · answer #4 · answered by thetunak 4 · 0 0

Bush was the worse of two evils. I am a Conservative. And their were no conservatives in this election.

2007-02-09 13:32:13 · answer #5 · answered by ALunaticFriend 5 · 0 0

The Swift Boat Veterans didn't think much of him when they wrote and/or contributed to the book "Unfit for Command".

2007-02-07 11:42:11 · answer #6 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 3 1

You are right - we will never know for sure.

We had to exercise our best judgment on what would likely happen.

2007-02-07 11:33:57 · answer #7 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0 0

right on man, just compare their records.

2007-02-09 01:53:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree, he would have been much, much better. It's a shame how the cons can con so well.

2007-02-07 11:34:10 · answer #9 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers