Who thinks that michigan should have been the team to play ohio state in the championship game?

Question

I think that michigan was the team to play. Because the rivalry is big between Ohio State and Michigan. Did you see Michigan make Ohio State make a run for their money at Ohio States stadium... Michigan just didnt care about winning against USC because they know that they are better than that. But let me know your opinions.

Answer 1

Certainly not me!

Answer 2

This was all set up to try and cause a TV jackpot playoff system. There is no way that it should have been Florida, they would have ended up #4 if USC had won. The only other "deserving" team besides Michigan I think is Boise St. How good are they? No one knows, because they didn't play anyone. But they are undefeated, and easily deserve the same opportunity as Florida to get the crap kicked out of themselves. BYU was handed the title in the 80's after barely beating a 6-5 hurt Michigan team, and no one said anything. Anyway, once again, it's the fans who will lose out the most. By the way, isn't coach Lloyd Carr just about the classiest NCAA football coach living today?

Answer 3

What a dumb question.
Michigan lost to Ohio State, Ohio State got humiliated by Florida. Florida deserves the national title. Michigan could not even beat USC. They have no reason at all to be in the national title debate for last season.

Answer 4

Boise State should have got a shot. That being said Florida dismantled Ohio State and Michigan lost to Ohio State. So, logic would tell you that Ohio State vs Florida was the right choice since they don't give non-BCS teams a chance

Answer 5

I did before the Rose Bowl - wow, sorry showing by the Big Ten. If they had a let down in not getting a second chance at Ohio State, what a coincidence Ohio State had the same problem - both flopped because the Big Ten was over-rated this year.

You can't get up for USC or Florida? At least put up a fight.

Answer 6

It would have been nice to see but Florida who won the conference title also deserved a fair shot as well. Both Florida and Michigan were very close in BCS computer points. Due to this the BCS saw no reason to give Michigan another shot at Ohio.St and gave it to Florida.

Michigan getting beat by USC the way they did only gave confirmation that the BCS made the right choice.

Answer 7

They played a great game but they lost so they had their chance. If they would have beaten USC and made a statement against them, I would maybe understand your argument. And something else, to me if a team does not win their respective conference like Oklahoma a few years ago, they should not get a chance at the National title just as is the case with Michigan.

Answer 8

Michigan had something to prove. They lost that game and they were trying I don't know what you are talking about. Plus, Florida and USC should have been the championship game obviously, but USC blew it. OSU, Michigan and the rest of the Big Ten sucks.

Answer 9

UHHHH did you happen to catch Florida KILL Ohio State?

Michigan LOST to Ohio State....why in the world do you think they shouldve been in the title game instead of a team that actually BEAT Ohio State?

Answer 10

So what you are saying is the Michigan only plays well when they care. So, they are losers. Right, that's what you are saying. And you would be right, Michigan LOST to Ohio State, Michigan LOST big time to USC.
UCLA would have kicked Michigans azz

Answer 11

A. I am a UNM Lobo married into a Ohio State family.
B. The championship games are over and have been for quite some time now.
C. Get over it already and lets just move on to next season. No more dwelling on what should have/ what could have happend. There done, over, end of story.