is the iraq war the biggest blunder ever made by a president?

Answer 1

nope. absolutely not.

Answer 2

This question was asked, verbatim, a few weeks ago. The concluding answer was no, this isn't the biggest blunder by a president. The biggest blunder was a tie between JFK's decision to ride in a convertible and Lincoln's decision to take in a show.

Answer 3

I would say its the biggest blunder since Vietnam and the biggest blunder of this generation! This is a different war than Vietnam but has many of the same hallmarks, both were entered into under false pretense (go look up the gulf of tonkin wing nuts), both had no plan for victory, and both dragged on and on and on and if you oppose them you are "for a cut and run strategy". Go back and check, Bush basically stole LBJ's playbook and implemented it to a tee. From our perspective as citizens these wars are blunders, costly, lengthy, great loss of blood and treasure. From the perspective of the war profiteers who controlled LBJ and GWB these wars are sheer genius. You cannot oppose them without your patriotism being impuned! Your with us or against us....these slogans simply reflect the level of brainwashing that they have achieved. When intelligent people are able to suspend logic and common sense, and just say go kill em all, they have achieved thier sinister goals!! This IS NOT A BLUNDER.....it was the plan all along, to get mired in this mess....just like vietnam. Anyone read the vietnam papers, when it was revealed there was no plan for victory??? sound familiar? As long as war is profitable we will be starting them, waging them, and continuing them as long as possible! If war was not profitable there would be a massive haste to end it as soon as possible! The right wing of this country has missed thier era and thier calling. 1930's Germany is where Cheney, Rummy, Wolfowitz and thier minions belong. Does lying to your populace to get into massive wars sound familiar? Does anyone remember Eisenhower warning us about the "pervasive influence of the military industrial complex"??? What do you think he was refering to? Not $300 hammers and $2000 toilet seats, thats just waste and inefficiency. He was refering to the possibility, or likelihood that with the clout and money that the MIC had after WW2, they might create a war in order to profit from it! Does this sound familiar, conservatives who still believe this poppycock, need to turn off Fox news and read some history! Bush is a puppet, follow the strings!

Answer 4

It's the biggest blunder ever made by congress. Can you say Blank check?

To the person above me: What possible reason could FDR have for allowing the Japanese to attack pearl harbor? If the troops at pearl harbor were prepared it would have been the same result... War with the Japanese.

McArthur wanted to nuke china and invade from the sea. God love him but that's insane.

Answer 5

Hardly, I would think FDR's incarceration of Japanese Americans and allowing the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor were bigger blunders. Somewhere in there is Truman's handling of the Korean war. He should have given MacArthur a free hand to run the war the way he knew how to do.
As a result, now we have Kim Jong Il to worry about, not to mention the Chinese preparing to shoot down our satellites.

Answer 6

Oh tremendous, yet another case of "i'm properly, you're incorrect" "us vs. them" mentality. Its no ask your self we are such an around the international hated usa and may't get our act together. Too busy accusing the different side of stupidity or wrongdoing. considering even as develop into political association on the difficulty of intelligence? the variety of large generalization to assert any president is purely accountable for "Islam's hatred of us of a." i do not imagine Bush is purely responsible for the hostility. He only got here about to be in place of work for the time of a considered necessary era and helped exacerbated hostility. for instance, utilising the note "marketing campaign" to describe his moves hostile to terrorism that were given misinterpreted and translated as "jihad" hostile to Muslim. in retaining with the quran, jihad is offensive and protecting, this speech positioned many on the offense. Bush's insensitivity in the route of Muslim values & his lack of understanding on Iraq society in the previous invading truly better hostility. because of short-conflict planning, the disastrous first months of the invasion is the clincher that better hatred hostile to us of a (no longer adequate Arab translators to communicate over with locals, dismantling the Iraq military and leaving those youthful men armed and unemployed, no instantaneous improvements in electrical energy, no instantaneous intervening time authorities in position, etc,). for this reason, i'd say his greatest blunder lies interior the rushed planning of the invasion which exacerbated hostilities in the route of U.S. The chaos that ensued in the course of the career pushed many civilians into the side of the insurgency. As president, Bush took the activity in representing us of a and should be the in common words human being responsible for any action American takes.

Answer 7

Vietnam was a fairly substantial blunder, time will tell if Iraq was as poorly thought out as Vietnam.

Answer 8

No, the biggest blunder was letting the terrorist population growth get out of hand.

Answer 9

I think the biggest blunder ever made by a US president was when Abraham Lincoln decided to go to the theatre.

Answer 10

FDR led us into World War II.
Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average
of 112,500 per year. Truman finished that war and started one in Korea , North Korea never
attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average
of 5,800 per year. Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never
attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did
nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed
the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Libya without firing a
shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers,
an average of 200 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.

Answer 11

No, sir the biggest blunder will be the invasion of Iran.