2007-02-07 01:46:32 · 26 answers · asked by benji 1 in Health ➔ General Health Care ➔ Other - General Health Care
yes they can
2007-02-07 02:54:43 · answer #1 · answered by traveller 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
In the whole of the world there are only 8 known blood types (or groups)
A+, A-, B+, B-, O+, O-, AB+, AB-.
With these types there is also an "anti" factor, which I shall not discuss here.
It wouldn't matter how many "anti" factors there might be. If you consider how many humans are on this earth, then the chances of there being two people being together/marrying with the same blood type (group) are more than high, but probable.
The only problem in all of this is the blood type of any issue of this pairing of people. There may be trouble for the newborn child and with this in mind, couples usually find information from the maternity department or obstetrician, and certain measures will then be adopted at birth to safeguard the infant's life.
If, however, by same blood group, you mean the same family, then there are laws regarding which members of your family it is legal for you to marry. For information on this matter you would be advised to contact your priest/minister or check out the Laws of Marriage
Hope this helps
matador 89
2007-02-07 10:15:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, of course two people with the same blood group can marry. There are only 4 blood groups so the chances of finding someone with the same blood group as you are pretty high. Having the same blood group would not have any adverse affect on any children produced
2007-02-07 13:22:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course provided there are no other legal restrictions preventing them. The thing that women with a rhesus negative blood group need to be aware of is that if they are married to a guy with a rhesus positive blood group their is a risk of second and subsequent children suffering rhesus syndrome. This can happen if the first child is rhesus positive and any of the first child's blood inadvertantly gets mixed with the mother's during the birthing process. If so the mother's body creates antibodies against it. If the second child is also rhesus positive then the mother's body will try and reject the baby which causes the syndrome.
That's my understanding of what happens anyway.
but just the same blood group, no problem there.
2007-02-07 10:51:33 · answer #4 · answered by gerrifriend 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there is no crime in marring someone of the same blood group as you at all. The only crime be if this person also happend to be related to you as in your sister or something like that. Otherwise blood type should not be a factor in getting married to the person or not. But look at the upside being of the same blood type means you could donate the other one blood if they ever needed it.
2007-02-07 09:52:57 · answer #5 · answered by Jasen A 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes - blood groupp is not a reason to marry or not to marry.
Marrying close family blod relatives is not a good idea because the genes in the two people are too similar and are more likely to cause problems
2007-02-08 10:56:33 · answer #6 · answered by Elk 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course they can, why shouldn't they? Billions of people in the world and only a few different blood groups.
2007-02-07 09:50:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes...even people with different blood types that would normally be incompatible to each other in regards to a blood transfusion, could still get married.
2007-02-07 09:50:24 · answer #8 · answered by rntroublemaker 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Blood group as in relation, or type?
2007-02-07 09:50:14 · answer #9 · answered by Dally 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depends when you say blood group does that mean a family link?!
If not i don't think it would be a problem talk to your GP if your worried.
If it is then seek help it's not right!!!!
2007-02-07 09:50:13 · answer #10 · answered by Missbutterfly:-) 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well I have been looking at the other answers, and well done Mr. scouser by the way. That's the best laugh I have had all day.
It may be that if they both have some rare group, it would not be advisable for them to have children.
2007-02-07 09:57:15 · answer #11 · answered by Not Ecky Boy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋