Strike, before a Nation developes Nukes, or After? What would you do and How?

Question

You are the top guy with the finger on all the right buttons, what do you do?

Everyone assumed strike as the U.S. Nuking Iran...not good..not thought out..no best answer yet

Answer 1

either way is OK as long as we strike first and they lose.

Answer 2

First, I would destroy that ugly button. I assume you are an American, living in the USA, and you are implying that the US should "nuke" Iran. I live in Cyprus, very close to the region and I do not want to die of a nuclear attack just because some people are blind to global realities. What makes some people believe that Iran or any other nation will use nuclear weapons on others? So far, only one nation has done that, back in August 1945! It is very easy to create enemies and terrorists when you control most of the mass media. Have you ever thought of why there are so many people around the world against the USA (not the American people, but the country)? This is all about who will control the earth's energy sources. International oil and weapon industries are creating enemies and targets for their profits. The result? People are dying, American soldiers and innocent civilians. Stop the greed, and there will be no need for nuclear or conventional weapons.

Answer 3

You know,if we could manage to go cold turkey and get over our addiction to war,we might find the world is a helluva lot easier to get along in.We have spent more on making war and preparing for war than their is wealth in this country-that includes the wealth of every person and every corporation every non-profit group,every mineable resource,everything of value in this country.And where has it got us.Well,now we are so resented and despised around the world that our that in a real crisis that presents a real threat,not the current manufactured b.s. the government and MSM is pushing down our throats,we will probably be on our own.The fact of the matter is,everyone is scared sh*tless of us,and are gearing up to defend themselves.What are we going to do when we find ourselves facing off with China,or Russia,or a combination of the two.There are clear signs that such power blocs are forming,mostly because Mr.Bush and Mr.Cheney have managed to show the world that we are actually a lot weaker than they thought we were six years ago.And if we do strike Iran,you can expect,at thje very least,an economic war with China and Russia,which is not something we could win.China alone holds 3 trillion dollars in U.S. debt.That's trillion with a T.We can barely pay the interest on that debt now.What do you think would happen to us if they called that marker?So,you know,if the right wing Jesus Freaks who ask questions like these,answer this,what are you going to do about all these problems?Blow up some more people?

Answer 4

Just because a nation has nukes doesn't necessarily mean that it's a threat to world peace. After all, we have nuclear weapons, and we haven't used them since 1945. I think that it depends on the nation and its intentions and its history. That being said, though, I think that it's best to wait until after a nation develops nuclear weapons, because it's never safe to make assumptions about a country's plans. We all know what they say about assuming, don't we?

Answer 5

Iran is years away from having "one" nuclear bomb.

US has tens and thousands of them. What makes you think that they are stupid enough to use nukes against the US?

And do you know which is the only nation in the world that actually used nukes?

Answer 6

I believe that you're about to find-out . Look for a 'strike' on Iran and Syria in the coming weeks or months . My guess ? Thousands of targets hit in one day .

Answer 7

That depends on what you mean by "Nukes". If you mean nuclear weapons, then you shut them down. But if you mean nuculer, the way Bush does, it is probably best to mind your own business. Look what he did to Iraq.

Answer 8

you know there is life after death
when sinners like bush die they go to hell and he will never get out of it when his skin and bone will be burnt ,His creator will give him the new skin to feel the pain (and that pain is manyfold of the pain one will suffer in nuke) he gave to others then he will enjoy those buttons even more
and when the people like the victims of bush dies they go sraight to paradise and there joys become manyfolds of thier sufferings .even they would die in calm no matter what ways are used to kill them by the basterds
that is how the things would be carried out

Answer 9

Libs couldn't answer that question, because the cold hard truth is that you would have to strike before. Libs, unfortunately will talk about sanctions, diplomacy and blah,blah,blah, anything but face the reality of the situation, that you have a madman heading an evil regime who calls America the Great Satan, funds terrorists organizations,and supplies weapons to KILL AMERICAN TROOPS!

Answer 10

first you reason with the reasonable. if the countries have in the past proved themselves to be capable of handling responsibility and been in close diplomatic relations to the international community, then you persue their intentions regarding nuclear power.

if the country has a track record of underminding the international community for lack of human regard, you reach out diplomatically and agressively renegotiate agendas.

if the effort fails consistently, and leaders seem hellbent on the irresponible advantages of nuclear power, then you strike.

Answer 11

The israeli's did the right thing back in the early 80's. otherwise saddam would have had his weapons of mass destruction