He made it a law that girls have to get an injection.
Now he wants to sell the State lottery.
The guy is another person that thinks he is king or very least a little dictator.
2007-02-07 00:50:05 · 7 answers · asked by Lou 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
We can't allow others to decide what we put into our bodies especially injections.
Our bodies are our own they do not belong to a person or group who thinks they are privy to the best way to protect us. If that was the case we would have to eat the way Gov. Rick Perry deems correct for our health.
2007-02-07 05:48:42 · update #1
That is interesting because Mitch Daniels of Indiana is in the process of outsourcing (selling) the Indiana lottery to a company in Texas. Mitch is also another Republican Governor that got in on Bush's coat-tails. He already sold a the 80/90 Northern Toll road that was paid for, for over 20 years to an Australian/Spanish Company and lost tax revenues for 75 years (that is the lease), and out sourced the Medicaid/Medicare insurance to IBM of Texas, he put thousands of State employees out of career jobs in this State. I wonder where the connection is between these right wingers starts and ends. Mitch also imposed State, county, city...income taxes to our paychecks, and to pay for the new Lucas Oil Stadium he imposed a restaurant tax. I can't afford to attend the Colts games, when tickets are $150-$300 dollars a piece during regular season as it is. If Republicans believe that other Republicans are responsible for less taxes in this Country, they are mental....I pay 33% with no return.
2007-02-07 01:13:30 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
At first he seemed like he would be great. But it appears that the longer he stays in office the more intoxicated on power he becomes.
Selling the rights ot run the lottry isn't a bad idea. I belive in privatizing most non-governmental jobs done by the government, toll taking, lottery, maintaining road, etc. But there is a right way and a wrong way to do it. A fee based or small percentage of the revenues with a cap could be a win-win situation.
The mandating the vaccine for all girls is wrong since even the CDCP hasn't recommended that yet.
2007-02-07 01:04:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
We already have a federal regulation banning gay marriage. (protection of Marriage Act) although I look after state's rights, marriage is something we would desire to agree on a time-honored for, regardless of in case you're for or against gay marriage. If some states understand and different states do no longer we've a multitude. you may desire to annul a gay marriage by potential of shifting to a state that doesn't are conscious of it. spectacular now, i think of the legality of any gay marriage is in question as long as we've a federal regulation against it.
2016-12-17 04:27:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thinks its pretty smart myself. He is trying to protect the people of his state from future disease's. In regards to the lottery, everyone knows that a private company can do anything less expensive than any government can do. It's a cost savings measure. Do you honestly think he would do something that would take tax revenues from the state? Try using that object attached to your shoulders for something other than a hat rack.
2007-02-07 00:55:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
he should be a good leader and get the injection first.
2007-02-07 01:00:27 · answer #5 · answered by neoconammo 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no way.... george bush was way worse. like texas big worse. like asswhole worse.
2007-02-07 00:55:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
idiotic question!
2007-02-07 02:06:51 · answer #7 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋