Looks like we've already lost the US literacy war
2007-02-07 00:29:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
The term ' war on terror' is meaningless, as terrorism is a tactic, not a movement. If you are suggesting that liberals do not want to stop terrorism, then you are misguided my friend. Don't believe the hype. Most liberals (outside of the few extreme left wingers we have in the US) want to stop terrorism. They just question the usefulness or utility of fighting pointless wars (see Iraq) that have NOTHING TO DO WITH FIGHTING TERRORISM. We went there because the powers that be felt that it was in our strategic interests to have gone there (which is questionable in itself. By the way, I do not necessarily consider myself a liberal, though I do think these issues require a little critical thinking.
2007-02-07 10:37:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by coderednation2007 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't know anything about liberals, but the majority of this country (finally) wants to prevent future terror by not killing anymore innocent people overseas. These dead children have fathers and brothers and mothers who may decide they have nothing to lose anymore and come after their "liberators". We've forced ourselves onto other countries long enough; lets attend to our own country for a change.
2007-02-07 08:31:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes they do. Look, even the ones that replied to your question won't say that they don't....
If they don't want us to lose the war, why can't they answer the question. Rosie O'Donnell refused to answer this question, David Letter also refused to answer this question. What are we supposed to take from that?
The Liberals would rather die than to see the US prevail in the war on terror. They hate Bush sooo much that they would rather see our soldiers die in vain.
That is unpatriotic to me.
2007-02-07 09:22:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by SARA P 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Perpetuating the war by murdering tens of thousands more innocents will never come to a victory for the US. It's peace or death.
2007-02-07 08:37:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
You can't wage war on a word nimrod and they way it's being fought is about the stupidest way to fight it but way try to explain that to a tin foil hat wearin' kool aid drinker
2007-02-07 08:31:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
No, we don't.
We want you to stop the war in Iraq that's killing innocent people - long after their leader was captured and killed.
2007-02-07 08:36:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Of course they do! even when it is in the best interest of all involved, they do NOT want this war to succeed. Sad souls!
2007-02-07 09:37:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by tcbtoday123 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sometimes I believe they do. I mean according to them everything in the world is Americas fault isn't it?
2007-02-07 09:26:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by aiminhigh24u2 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
who can take you seriouly if you dont take the time to correct your spelling?
2007-02-07 08:31:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by mikecubbie69 4
·
3⤊
0⤋