Well,personally,I don't see a reason why it should be banned,but,people,generally speaking,tend to fear what they do not understand.A man who loves a man,or a woman who loves a woman in a way which physical expressions of love are involved is viewed as "not society like" because of the main focus that people have given to details such as man and man (or woman and woman) cannot procreate,thus why should they be together?
If love is an expression of feelings of mutual acceptance, then for whom and between whom it is expressed shouldn't matter.Should it be accepted by society then becomes an issue which society is not ready for.
Just like there was a time when society did not accept interracial dating,I believe this too will come to pass,as we realize that we cannot impose our beliefs on anyone,and that every person is free to do with their own life as they please...with whom ever they please...for as long as they please.
2007-02-07 00:23:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by ERIC R 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
The ethical decline has been with the temptation to constantly push limitations and constantly short of the forbidden fruit. This inspiration was once recognized and illustrated within the tale of Adam and Eve and the satan represents our possess temptation (Not seeking to be devout, as I am now not, however this is a well instance of this). I consider we're too scrutinizing of politicians as is, almost always approximately needless matters (faith, private existence disorders). Our decline is not stemmed from the media, it stems from our schooling. America is swiftly falling in intelligence in evaluation to the beyond and to different international locations, and that makes it simpler for the general public to be fooled. The typical man or woman is not wise (regardless of how terrible that sounds) and if we rule of plenty (Not technically given that of ways the electoral procedure works) however politicians are judged on public opinion, so all they have got to do is enchantment to the uneducated and their doing good. And many folks can not clutch how insurance policies paintings, or how over the years matters gets greater as an alternative of immidiate outcome inflicting in a higher crash, and the gift is all that issues to the general public. I do not care that a man or woman has performed medicinal drugs ago, or in the event that they cheat on their better halves, it is going to say some thing approximately who they're as a man or woman however now not their capacity to participate in the task. Bill Clinton is tarnished with the Lewinsky scandal, however he nonetheless did a colossal task as president. I recognize there may be this factor approximately if their now not moral, then they'll harm the folks, and make deficient offerings. Cheating and medicinal drugs don't seem to be the worst matters folks can do. Plus so much folks are affected/encouraged by means of superstar movements than political figures. America is old Rome. The losers constantly turn out to be the victors over the years.
2016-09-07 00:32:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never heard 'third sex' used to refer to gay people; I've always heard it used as a reference to transgender or intersexed individuals or those who are otherwise outside the gender binary.
Oh, well. Anyhow, there is no reason why homosexuality should be banned and not accepted in our society. I'm still awaiting a good reason, because every one being tossed around is complete bunk.
2007-02-07 11:49:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no such thing as "the third sex". Homosexuality is a variation in orientation, not a change in gender.
There is no reason not to accept homosexuality in society.
Reporting others answers who do indeed answer your question is called Harassment not to mention you insult users by referring to them as stupid. One has to wonder how long it will be before your post will be deleted.
2007-02-07 00:44:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think a lot of ppl feel intimated by "weird things". they c it as not being normal so they have mixed feelings about it. this society is very closed minded anyway if u ask me. i think that if america is really such a "free country" ppl should be at least able to express themselves the way they want to and not b judged! me personally my motto is "whateva floats ur boat, as long as i dont have to sleep with that person i frankly dont care" i will neva put a person down for their religious, or sexual prefrences. its what makes us as people/individuals so much more unique. thats how we grow, learn and understand diff things. i just wish ppl would open their eyes more...
2007-02-07 00:15:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jessie 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Um, no actually your facts are wrong. Scientifically the "third sex" is actually TRANSGENDERS and Intersexed individuals.
Third sex refers to Third Gender, ie Male, female, transgender.
Try doing a little research before making wild claims.
2007-02-07 01:22:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by DEATH 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
lol you'd have to have a fourth sex too then?
Lol. You want to make a moral judgement and then you ban religion from the negotiating table?
Interesting approach.
2007-02-07 00:30:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by rostov 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
In most enlightened countries they are accepted as they are its only this chip on the shoulder attitude which is holding them back.
2007-02-07 00:21:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by burning brightly 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
it souldn´t really. it is part of our new society values. they exist as there exist new religions
2007-02-07 00:14:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lic. York 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I'm sorry, but I was not aware of a "third sex". Could you tell me what that is, please?
2007-02-07 00:12:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Edith Piaf 4
·
3⤊
2⤋