2007-02-06 23:35:59 · 9 answers · asked by invisibleprancer 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
absolutely! He was not in the current use of the word, but in the 18th century Britain use of the word, he was. Great Poet!!!
2007-02-07 02:12:05 · answer #1 · answered by dreamoutloud2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blake is considered an early romanticin the same way as Robert Burns is considered an early romantic. Many of their themes are of "country" or natural matters.
2007-02-07 01:28:28 · answer #2 · answered by jcboyle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blake had always struck me as far more of a mystic than a Romantic; a wild, free range mystic without dogma.
My favourite story about him was how his wife once called him into their garden to watch their cat eating a rose.
2007-02-07 01:31:45 · answer #3 · answered by Vivienne T 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes he is known to be a romantic poet, who shares the romantics many characteristics , such as glorifying mother nature as a the reflection of the greatness of God's creation, a pure place where man seeks his full being, and as a bridge to the sublime, to the core of creativity. He is a great poet
i wish i was of some help:)
2007-02-07 00:46:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say Romantic for the English literature.
2007-02-06 23:46:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on how you are using the term 'Romantic' which is a very controversial one. One could equally say that he was a 'Goth' or that he was a 'relgious maniac'. You must not fall into the fallacy of categorisation and reduction.
2007-02-06 23:38:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, he was a romantic painter.
2007-02-07 01:05:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Was Handle a crank?
2007-02-06 23:38:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
-he was romanticist, categorised by literary theorists as belonging to romanticism literary age and tradition.
2007-02-07 00:22:39 · answer #9 · answered by ari-pup 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋