2007-02-06 21:03:52 · 6 answers · asked by deepak s 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Gotta finish the thought there, eh?
2007-02-06 21:12:01 · answer #1 · answered by George 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In limited-overs cricket no distinction is made between the two ways in which an innings is closed, using up all the overs or losing all ten wickets. In both cases the team has used up all the resources of their innings. In an uninterrupted innings, there is no difference between Team 1's score of 250, for instance, whether it were 250 for 3 wickets in 50 overs or whether it were 250 all out in 47 overs. Similarly in an interrupted innings, the method of target revision cannot and should not distinguish between whether Team 1's innings were terminated by being all out or by using up its allocation of overs.
2007-02-07 11:42:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just because we have people like you out there.
2007-02-07 05:06:51 · answer #3 · answered by dillydally 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
U Pl. think over it.
2007-02-07 05:13:01 · answer #4 · answered by Jacky.- the "INDIAN". 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
o o o no ask your question and watch some cricket
2007-02-07 05:32:52 · answer #5 · answered by Tokkie 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
make ur question more clear
2007-02-07 05:14:54 · answer #6 · answered by shabaz khan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋