Murdering 3000 innocent people.
2007-02-06 19:44:45 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think he could have figured out a better way to psychologically attack us so he could start his damn war. "the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country" Reich Marshall Herman Goering at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trial. Where else have we heard that kind of ploy? http://www.jonhs.net/911/ See for yourself.
2007-02-06 19:58:29 · answer #1 · answered by rick m 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Being a crackpot really brings out the intelligence of republicans. Look at the insults and hate from people who know little about anything other than wal-mart and nascar. These are the people who do not and will not accept any other answers than what they are told by the elite. These are the people who do as they are told, give up their liberties for terrorism, and still think they are winning in Iraq. If all you want to do is insult this person without any rebuttal evedence then you yourself are the crackpot. Go back and watch foxnews, wal-mart, and sleep like you are told. You people are the reason this country is dying, you insult and throw reality around as if it doesn't exist. You and your bush can go down together, enjoy the ride patriots who do nothing but drink the koolaid they are given. Sheep
2007-02-07 03:58:57 · answer #2 · answered by 33 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes it was, cause it was perfect diversion, and it was the greatest robbery in the history of the USA, where a lot gold was stolen, like 160 billion $ gold worth, and 3000 people payed the price, and till now more than 800 000 innocent people are dead in Iraq and Afghanistan
2007-02-07 03:59:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
well going along with your consipiracy theory, which makes since only because they found saddam but not osama, and britain is doing most of the commanding in afghanistan... it was only neccesary to insure a second presidential nomination to continue to carry out his politcal agenda and get his rich friends richer... who cares if everyone else got screwed!!!
2007-02-07 03:49:58 · answer #4 · answered by ms.jackson... 4 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You get the idiot for a day award! if you are going to be so damn disrespectful with no facts to back up your disrespect, consider yourself reported! You really do not deserve to be a US citizen!
2007-02-07 09:53:20 · answer #5 · answered by tcbtoday123 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And I thought it was only teenage boys that were that gullible. I was wrong. Your proof that girls are just as gullible and too lazy to research anything too.
2007-02-07 05:02:52 · answer #6 · answered by mark g 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sick deranged liberal bedwetting moonbats believe it.
Normal healthy sane individuals watched Islamicfascists fly planes into it.
Good luck with your drug rehab.
2007-02-07 07:01:15 · answer #7 · answered by mrfeelsgreat1 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
its not necessary though. but for a new and improved WTC its necessary. He's a retard.... pig for breakfast, choking for fun, slaughtering for sport, killing for business.
2007-02-07 03:53:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Is it necessary for people to embrace stupidity?------Well,------ obviously it is necessary for some.
2007-02-07 05:23:21 · answer #9 · answered by DixeVil 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well I think that is a media diversion to blame it on such a stupid guy as bush, I think it had more to do with Israel.
2007-02-07 03:51:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋