English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-06 18:27:16 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

15 answers

Yes. China and EU are expanding more rapidly in terms of economy. Things that could have helped America out of bankruptcy (i.e. the technology sector) were not supported by the Bush administration... add the cost of the Iraq war and its clear that America is on the decline.

Americans are becoming more obese and less educated. Its only a matter of time now.

2007-02-06 18:33:39 · answer #1 · answered by shanhelp 3 · 2 0

America is no longer a super power and hasn’t been for some time now, America can no longer win wars not even against third world countries, China is the up and coming super power for sure. America has not only lost wars during the last six years but lost it’s respect and prestige and has slipped very heavily into debt your only hope is a Democrat President maybe able to reverse the slide.

2007-02-06 19:18:53 · answer #2 · answered by Koala 2 · 0 0

If we are speaking about nuclear conflict, then all bets are off. each body loses in a nuclear conflict. the perception of "mutual guaranteed destruction" (that signifies that if one u . s . a . shoots off its nukes, then its enemy will shoot nukes again, and both international places get wiped out) is why the chilly conflict not in any respect went warm. the country and China both have the potential to shoot nuclear guns around the international, and both have sophisticated missile protection structures. So probable it should be hit and omit going both techniques, yet even some sneaking by skill of should be adequate to cripple both one among them. now to not indicate the shown reality that extremely some different international places have nukes, too. If we push aside nuclear guns, then that is much better complicated. The question is, who's landing on whose seashores first? for my area, China would not be ready to defeating u . s . a .'s fleet with the intention to land troops on US soil. on the different hand, at the same time as the U. S. ought to certainly be ready to attack the chinese language mainland, they would not stand a probability antagonistic to such an massive foe. China is geographically huge, and they could actual conscript the equivalent of u . s . a .'s finished inhabitants into protection rigidity provider. And it really is unlike China's protection rigidity technologies is susceptible, they're a cutting-edge rigidity that ought to submit a serious strive against. unlike combating Saddam's military contained in the desert. So contained in the proper, I even ought to call it a stalemate. With nukes, each body loses. with out nukes, no man or woman wins. Edit: If Europe grow to be sided with China, then the country can not probably win. except we hit upon the nuclear situation, yet as I reported before, there is not any victory on hand that way. It would not even ought to grow to be a protection rigidity conflict for Europe...if the country had no allies to mortgage it funds for those protection rigidity expenditure, then it can not probably have adequate money to salary *that a lot* conflict suddenly. Defeat via economics, i wager.

2016-12-03 20:20:17 · answer #3 · answered by plyler 4 · 0 0

The further right America goes the closer we become to loosing our super power status. The right would rather waste our resources for the sake of power itself then do the necessary actions that garnishes the respect of the global community. That is what the American right does not understand, might does not make right, being right means using diplomacy and cooperation to make the world a better place.

2007-02-06 18:43:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Depends on your definition of super power. Does morality factor in anywhere? Does understanding foreign culture feature at all? Does super power simply mean big guns, big bangs, lots dead, no positive outcome? Are super powers lead by liars and megalomaniacs? I could go on asking many more questions....

2007-02-06 18:39:53 · answer #5 · answered by meldorhan 4 · 1 0

No matter what the media might lead you to believe, the USA is by far (so far you need to transfer busses 3 times) the strongest superpower in the world.

2007-02-06 18:32:19 · answer #6 · answered by Wocka wocka 6 · 0 2

Not for a long time.

The whole world treats us like a welfare state constantly asking for handouts and assistance. If we go bankrupt, they'll starve, and we'll still be the richest nation on the planet.

Countries like Japan, Australia and England, on the other hand, are self-supporting and can survive on their own.

2007-02-06 18:37:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i can see a few possible major powers in the future maybe indonesia deffinateley china most likely india maybe pakistan and if russia has the will but america maybe...

2007-02-06 20:05:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think we really are a superpower.

2007-02-06 18:32:54 · answer #9 · answered by katalina 2 · 1 0

Yes, but Jesus is coming soon so all Americans will be in Heaven

2007-02-06 18:38:17 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Sniggles 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers