I like to follow up on a larger range of questions simply to filter out the rubbish.
Rose P.
2007-02-06 15:37:09 · 8 answers · asked by rose p 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
This is the first time I have noticed this . There are usually 10 pages plus of Q's. I agree there was far too much
rubbish. I wonder, though, will the proportion of idiot askers remain the same. RP.
2007-02-06 15:49:15 · update #1
They have all been resolved, except for 48. We now know all there is to know about lgb&t.
2007-02-06 15:47:21 · answer #1 · answered by barbara b 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, it's so obviously a cooler number, cooler than, say, 49, which might be why they stopped at 48. Lordy, I mean, look at the number of whole numbers you can divide into 48, like, wow. I wouldn't be surprised if they found some ancient civilisation that used 48 as their number base!!! And don't, just don't, even think about mentioning 47! You cain't divide NUTHIN' into THAT digital disaster. 47 would be made illegal in any right-thinking country, fo'gawdsakes. And since 50 is pushing ME, let's not get out of our ballpark here, ok?
2007-02-06 20:14:48 · answer #2 · answered by clearlight_justletgo 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This section has be so overwhelmed with bull from a few (very few, actually, using many different screen names) that most sane people have left in droves. I drop by every so often, but cannot tell you why. I certainly learn nothing here, for the questions have all been asked and answered 100's of times.
2007-02-06 15:40:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Becasue people are so damb rude. No one really wants to post a question about being gay, becasue they cop heaps of abuse and they are sick of it.
We need to fins away to weed out the idiots and just have people who are willing to answer questions seriously.
2007-02-06 15:39:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably, maybe they just got bored finally!
2007-02-06 16:44:21 · answer #5 · answered by kar506 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
AND, have you also noticed its more for homophobes than LGBT?
2007-02-06 23:58:10 · answer #6 · answered by Croeso 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
ok....this would be the kind of question to filter out right?
2007-02-06 15:39:32 · answer #7 · answered by angie20k 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Guess we'll have to ask more. :-)
2007-02-06 15:41:20 · answer #8 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋