How to define a time base as reference for Atomic cycles ?

Question

Quantum information states the electron does not orbit the nucleus but instead vibrates in some wave propagation, yet definitions of the number of electron orbits per second exist.. While certainly vibration and wave propagtion are factors, the cyclic motion of rotation and orbit must begin at atomic levels but where and is there a base value of reference? There are various measurements defined which should allow some calculation of this but the definitions when cross-compared are conflicting.

Electron orbits per second = about 6.5 trillion times per second
Speed of an electron in hydrogen = 220,000,000 cm per second
Hydrogen Radius = 5,292,000,000th of a centimeter.
Light travels radius of hydrogen atom = 10 to -18th power/second.
Light travels 1 foot (30.48 cm) = 1,000,000,000th of a second (ns)

By these definitions the electron orbit should be more per second than defined and the speed of light appears not constant in moving from the hydrogen atom outward to 1 foot.

An absolute exists in rotational,orbital,vibrational cycles, the true factors of time. A timeframe greater than the Earth's rotation can be established, less than a second is harder to define. There is a math relation in the cycles of the sun and Earth and cycles existing out to at least 100,000 yrs. Should not a timeframe smaller than Earth's rotation from the second and smaller logically share this same math relation ? Two things exist. The chronology of cyclic time does not agree with the scientific version of the origin and history of mankind and the solar system. The chronology of time at magnitudes less than the second does not agree with the facts defined in speed, number of orbits, distance, etc of electron and light motion ( see previous question). By these facts 1 second = 3 elec cycles (1/2 phase) :1000 sound waves : 1 million radio waves : 1 trillion molecular vibes : 1 quadrillion atomic vibes : 7,315,135,662,000,000,000 electron orbits. E orbit causes E vibration ?

The interest here is this. The current values for time atomically appear NOT to have a math relation with time defined electrically and from the Earth's rotation and orbit. If everything is built atomically there should be a cyclic time relation !

Time is a measurement of cycles which must be observed several times to be defined. Our entire time-based system is based on observation of the Earth's motions and recently atoms. Here's the paradox. Intelligent mankind charting these motions can only be dated to around 6,000 yrs ago on Earth. How is it they had a precise knowledge of the Zodiac cycle of 25,920 years, a cycle science defines now as the precession of Earth's axis. That cycle would require near 100,000 yrs of intelligent charting. Moreso, the base value of that cycle is 72 yrs, a number which does not relate to any cycle within the solar system ! Interestingly, the binary orbit of the nearest star system Centauri is nearly 72 years suggesting the cycle was charted from there

Answer 1

Interesting. What do you think?